Literature DB >> 28286366

Relations among Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Response Measures, Categorical Loudness Judgments, and Their Associated Physical Intensities.

Peggy A Korczak1, LaGuinn P Sherlock2, Monica L Hawley3, Craig Formby4.   

Abstract

This study characterizes changes in response properties of toneburst-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and/or middle latency responses (MLRs) as a function of perceived loudness and physical intensity of these stimuli and delineates the range of levels corresponding to categorical loudness judgments for these stimuli. ABRs/MLRs were recorded simultaneously to 500- and 2,000-Hz tonebursts in 10 normal-hearing adults at levels corresponding to each listener's loudness judgments for four categories on Contour Test of Loudness. Group mean ABR wave V and MLR wave Pa latency values increased significantly as loudness judgments decreased. Group mean amplitude values for ABR wave V-V' and MLR wave Na-Pa increased as the listeners' categorical judgments increased. Listeners assigned a broad range (30 to 40 dB) of stimulus intensities when judging loudness of these stimuli within a specific loudness category. This was true for all four loudness categories and both frequencies. Thus, it appears that tone-evoked ABR/MLR response measures reflect, in part, the listener's perception of loudness. Response latencies are a more sensitive indicator of listener's loudness percept than corresponding response amplitudes. An appreciable range of signal levels was judged to be categorically equivalent across listeners. Thus, limiting how loudness judgments can be applied to prescriptive hearing aid fittings in individuals who cannot provide accurate loudness judgments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory evoked potentials; and categorical loudness judgments

Year:  2017        PMID: 28286366      PMCID: PMC5344691          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  36 in total

1.  Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  U Hoppe; F Rosanowski; H Iro; U Eysholdt
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  2001

2.  Loudness and the acoustic reflex.

Authors:  R H Margolis; G R Popelka
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Loudness and auditory brain stem evoked response.

Authors:  R M Darling; L L Price
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Frequency specificity of the auditory brain stem response to bone-conducted tones in infants and adults.

Authors:  J M Nousak; D R Stapells
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Mikaël Ménard; Stéphane Gallégo; Christian Berger-Vachon; Lionel Collet; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Temporal integration of loudness measured using categorical loudness scaling and matching procedures.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Suyash N Joshi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  ABR and DPOAE indices of normal loudness in children and adults.

Authors:  Yula Cherpelis Serpanos
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Adaptive plasticity in brainstem of adult listeners following earplug-induced deprivation.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; Jennifer Blount
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Repeated Measurement of Absolute and Relative Judgments of Loudness: Clinical Relevance for Prescriptive Fitting of Aided Target Gains for soft, Comfortable, and Loud, But Ok Sound Levels.

Authors:  Craig Formby; JoAnne Payne; Xin Yang; Delphanie Wu; Jason M Parton
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Responses Measured Pre- and Posttreatment for Hyperacusic Hearing-Impaired Persons Successfully Treated to Improve Sound Tolerance and to Expand the Dynamic Range for Loudness: Case Evidence.

Authors:  Craig Formby; Peggy Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Susan Gold
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.