Literature DB >> 16424944

The DSL method for pediatric hearing instrument fitting: historical perspective and current issues.

Richard Seewald1, Sheila Moodie, Susan Scollie, Marlene Bagatto.   

Abstract

The Desired Sensation Level (DSL) Method was originally developed in the early 1980s to provide clinicians with a systematic, science-based approach to pediatric hearing instrument fitting that ensures audibility of amplified speech by accounting for factors that are uniquely associated with the provision of amplification to infants and young children who have hearing loss. This review identifies and describes several of the primary factors that have been considered in the development of the DSL Method. Specifically, the issues discussed relate to: (1) the definition and measurement of relevant acoustic, electroacoustic and audiometric variables; (2) how the external ear acoustics of infants and young children are accounted for in the DSL Method for both audiometric assessment and in the fitting of amplification; and (3) how the DSL Method has evolved concurrently with developments in hearing instrument and electroacoustic measurement technologies. Finally, current issues in the field are identified that have motivated the development of version 5.0 of the DSL Method for hearing instrument fitting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16424944      PMCID: PMC4111493          DOI: 10.1177/108471380500900402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  16 in total

1.  Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; M A Stone
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1999-08

2.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.

Authors:  D Byrne; H Dillon; T Ching; R Katsch; G Keidser
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments--comparison of acoustic characteristics.

Authors:  K Smeds; A Leijon
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  2001

4.  Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices.

Authors:  L E Cornelisse; R C Seewald; D G Jamieson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; R Katsch; D Byrne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Selecting amplification characteristics for young hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  R C Seewald; M Ross; M K Spiro
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of stimulus intensity on speech perception by deaf children.

Authors:  N P Erber; L H Witt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1977-05

9.  Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.

Authors:  C Kamm; D D Dirks; M R Mickey
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-12

10.  Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.

Authors:  J A Feigin; J G Kopun; P G Stelmachowicz; M P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge translation in audiology: promoting the clinical application of best evidence.

Authors:  Sheila T Moodie; Anita Kothari; Marlene P Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Linda T Miller; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

2.  A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Earl E Johnson; Sanna Hou; Harvey Dillon; Vicky Zhang; Lauren Burns; Patricia van Buynder; Angela Wong; Christopher Flynn
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-18

4.  Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Jani A Johnson; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

6.  Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Ruth A Bentler; Patricia A Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Role of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Reducing the Age at Hearing Aid Fitting in Children With Hearing Loss Identified by Newborn Hearing Screening.

Authors:  Kinjal Mehta; Peter Watkin; Margaret Baldwin; Josephine Marriage; Merle Mahon; Deborah Vickers
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Consensus on Hearing Aid Candidature and Fitting for Mild Hearing Loss, With and Without Tinnitus: Delphi Review.

Authors:  Magdalena Sereda; Derek J Hoare; Richard Nicholson; Sandra Smith; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.