Literature DB >> 28286364

Considerations in the Development of a Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument.

LaGuinn P Sherlock1, Craig Formby2.   

Abstract

Most clinicians approach the objective fitting of hearing aids with three goals in mind: audibility, comfort, and tolerance. When these three amplification goals have been met, the hearing aid user is more likely to adapt to and perceive benefit from hearing aid use. However, problems related to the loudness of sounds and reduced sound tolerance, which may or may not be reported by the aided user, can adversely impact adaptation to amplification and the individual's quality of life. Although there are several standardized questionnaires available to evaluate hearing aid benefit and satisfaction, there is no standardized questionnaire or interview tool for evaluating reduced sound tolerance and the related impact on hearing aid use. We describe a 36-item tool, the Sound Tolerance Questionnaire (STQ), consisting of six sections, including experience with hearing aids, sound sensitivity/intolerance, medical and noise exposure histories, coexisting tinnitus problems, and a final question to differentiate the primary and secondary problems related to sound intolerance, tinnitus, and hearing loss. In its current format as a research tool, the STQ was sensitive in pinpointing vague sound tolerance complaints not reported by the study participants in eligibility screening by Formby et al. A refined version of the STQ, the Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument (STIQI), structured as a two-part tool, is presented in the appendix for prospective clinical use. The STIQI has potential utility to delineate factors contributing to loudness complaints and/or reduced sound tolerance in individuals considering hearing aid use, as well as those who have been unsuccessful hearing aid users secondary to loudness complaints or sound intolerance. The STIQI, when validated and refined, also may hold promise for predicting hearing aid benefit and/or assessing treatment-related change over time of hearing aid use or interventions designed to remediate problems of loudness and/or sound intolerance among hearing aid candidates or users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hearing aid benefit; hyperacusis; sound tolerance

Year:  2017        PMID: 28286364      PMCID: PMC5344695          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  31 in total

1.  Effects of providing and withholding postfitting fine-tuning adjustments on outcome measures in novice hearing aid users: a pilot study.

Authors:  D R Cunningham; K J Williams; L J Goldsmith
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Loudness scaling revisited.

Authors:  C Elberling
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Noise and Drug Induced Cochlear Damage Leads to Functional Reorganisation in the Central Auditory System.

Authors:  Richard J. Salvi; Jian Wang; Alan H. Lockwood; Robert Burkard; Dalian Ding
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  Unmyelinated type II afferent neurons report cochlear damage.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Elisabeth Glowatzki; Paul Albert Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices.

Authors:  L E Cornelisse; R C Seewald; D G Jamieson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) Protocol.

Authors:  M Valente; D Van Vliet
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-03

7.  Development of the Three-Clinic Hearing Aid Selection Profile (HASP).

Authors:  G P Jacobson; C W Newman; D A Fabry; S A Sandridge
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.

Authors:  C Kamm; D D Dirks; M R Mickey
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-12

9.  Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire.

Authors:  S Khalfa; S Dubal; E Veuillet; F Perez-Diaz; R Jouvent; L Collet
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

10.  Adaptive plasticity in brainstem of adult listeners following earplug-induced deprivation.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro; Jennifer Blount
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Structured Counseling for Auditory Dynamic Range Expansion.

Authors:  Susan L Gold; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.