Literature DB >> 28286362

Intra- and Intersubject Variability in Audiometric Measures and Loudness Judgments in Older Listeners with Normal Hearing.

Monica L Hawley1, LaGuinn P Sherlock2, Craig Formby3.   

Abstract

This research was to document intra- and intersubject variability in measures of pure tone thresholds, loudness discomfort levels, and the Contour test of loudness for tonal and speech stimuli across 8 to 10 repeated test sessions over a period of almost 1 year in a group of 11 normal-hearing, older middle-aged adults (39 to 73 years, mean of 56 years). The measured pure tone thresholds and loudness discomfort levels were determined to be stable across sessions, with variability on the order of 5 dB. The categorical judgments for the Contour test for both warbled tones and spondaic speech stimuli decreased over time in level required for categories greater than comfortable. This result contrasts with reports of a slight increase over time when young, normal-hearing adults were tested in comparable measures. The intrasubject variability in the Contour test results was greatest for the 4,000-Hz tonal stimulus for which the largest time effects were observed. The intersubject variability was typically greater than the intrasubject variability and typically increased as the loudness category increased, with some exceptions. The results from this study can be used to aid in power and sample size analyses using these measures in future studies designed to compare effects of treatments based on changes in loudness judgments over time.

Keywords:  Sound tolerance; categorical loudness judgments; loudness discomfort level; pure tone threshold

Year:  2017        PMID: 28286362      PMCID: PMC5344715          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  24 in total

1.  Methodological aspects of auditory threshold measurements.

Authors:  J F CORSO; A COHEN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-01

Review 2.  Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.

Authors:  Pierre L Divenyi; Philip B Stark; Kara M Haupt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An examination of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a 3-year period of hearing-aid use.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Dana L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of the fitting parameters of a two-channel compression system on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  B C Moore; C Lynch; M A Stone
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1992-12

6.  Changes in air and bone conduction thresholds as a function of age.

Authors:  J C NIXON; A GLORIG; W S HIGH
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Tinnitus - Hyperacusis and the Loudness Discomfort Level Test - A Preliminary Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Tinnitus J       Date:  1996

8.  Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons.

Authors:  Fu-Shing Lee; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno; John H Mills
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones.

Authors:  Nicolas Schmuziger; Rudolf Probst; Jacek Smurzynski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Dana L Wilson; Nancy N Barlow; Carolyn Garner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Relations among Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Response Measures, Categorical Loudness Judgments, and Their Associated Physical Intensities.

Authors:  Peggy A Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Repeated Measurement of Absolute and Relative Judgments of Loudness: Clinical Relevance for Prescriptive Fitting of Aided Target Gains for soft, Comfortable, and Loud, But Ok Sound Levels.

Authors:  Craig Formby; JoAnne Payne; Xin Yang; Delphanie Wu; Jason M Parton
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 3.  A Sound Therapy-Based Intervention to Expand the Auditory Dynamic Range for Loudness among Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Losses: Case Evidence Showcasing Treatment Efficacy.

Authors:  Craig Formby; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Susan L Gold
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Responses Measured Pre- and Posttreatment for Hyperacusic Hearing-Impaired Persons Successfully Treated to Improve Sound Tolerance and to Expand the Dynamic Range for Loudness: Case Evidence.

Authors:  Craig Formby; Peggy Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Susan Gold
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

5.  Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.

Authors:  Maarten van Beurden; Monique Boymans; Mirjam van Geleuken; Dirk Oetting; Birger Kollmeier; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.