Literature DB >> 7410230

Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus.

J P Wilson.   

Abstract

Delayed acoustic waves have been measured in the sealed ear canal in response to click and tone-burst stimuli. The response shows compressive nonlinearity, evidence for 'active' processing, and frequency tuning. At low sound levels group and phase delays correspond, and represent about 15 waves delay for the mid-frequency region. Frequency positions of pressure peaks and dips for continous tone stimulation can be predicted from the phase delays and persist well below threshold. Fine-structure in the audiogram is also related to these irregularities. Hydrostatic pressure, induced by body tilt, can eliminate audiogram fine-structure and reve rse the positions of peaks and dips for inverted body positions. This is interpreted as due to changes of internal reflection from the middle ear caused by acoustic impedance changes. Tinnitus can be induced by this inverted body posture, can be measured objectively in certain cases, and demonstrates properties such as synchronisation and beating with an external signal. These findings support the view of Kemp that the phenomena of acoustic re-emission, threshold fine-structure, and tinnitus are interrelated and originate within the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7410230     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(80)90060-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  26 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Spontaneous basilar membrane oscillation and otoacoustic emission at 15 kHz in a guinea pig.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; K Grosh; J Zheng; E de Boer; Y Zou; T Ren
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

4.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial irregularities of sensitivity along the organ of Corti of the cochlea.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

9.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

10.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.