Literature DB >> 7328396

Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.

M A Shand, E S Klima.   

Abstract

A series of unordered recall tasks was administered to groups of congenitally deaf subjects for whom American Sign Language (ASL) is the principal means of communication. A suffix effect was observed when an ASL sign was suffixed to a list of ASL signs (Experiment 1), and when a line drawing of an ASL sign was suffixed to a list of line drawings of ASL signs (Experiment 3). The suffix effect was a diminished magnitude when a printed English word was suffixed to a list of printed words (Experiment 2). The findings of Experiment 1 and 3 argue conclusively against the suffix effect resulting solely from sensory store differences. Additionally, the results of Experiment 3 argue conclusively against explanation of the effect as arising solely from differences in the processing of "static" versus "changing-state" input.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7328396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn        ISSN: 0096-1515


  26 in total

Review 1.  The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory.

Authors:  M Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech.

Authors:  B de Gelder; J Vroomen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

3.  In search of a strong visual recency effect.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

4.  Common processes underlie enhanced recency effects for auditory and changing-state stimuli.

Authors:  A M Glenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

5.  Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.

Authors:  M W Battacchi; G M Pelamatti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

6.  Recall of order information by deaf signers: phonetic coding in temporal order recall.

Authors:  V L Hanson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

Review 7.  Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.

Authors:  C G Penney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

8.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.

Authors:  Lance C Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

Review 9.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

10.  Comparisons of memory for nonverbal auditory and visual sequential stimuli.

Authors:  D J McFarland; A T Cacace
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.