Literature DB >> 2266865

Common processes underlie enhanced recency effects for auditory and changing-state stimuli.

A M Glenberg1.   

Abstract

For some stimuli, dynamic changes are crucial for identifying just what the stimuli are. For example, spoken words (or any auditory stimuli) require change over time to be recognized. Kallman and Cameron (1989) have proposed that this sort of dynamic change underlies the enhanced recency effect found for auditory stimuli, relative to visual stimuli. The results of three experiments replicate and extend Kallman and Cameron's finding that dynamic visual stimuli (that is visual stimuli in which movement is necessary to identify the stimuli), relative to static visual stimuli, engender enhanced recency effects. In addition, an analysis based on individual differences is used to demonstrate that the processes underlying enhanced recency effects for auditory and dynamic visual stimuli are substantially similar. These results are discussed in the context of perceptual grouping processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2266865     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage.

Authors:  Clive Frankish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Artifactual and genuine relationships of lateral difference scores to overall accuracy in studies of laterality.

Authors:  L J Chapman; J P Chapman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Discovering functionally independent mental processes: the principle of reversed association.

Authors:  J C Dunn; K Kirsner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Enhanced recency effects with changing-state and primary-linguistic stimuli.

Authors:  H J Kallman; P Cameron
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05

5.  Reminding as a basis for temporal judgments.

Authors:  E Winograd; R M Soloway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.

Authors:  M A Shand; E S Klima
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1981-11

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Hearing by eye.

Authors:  R Campbell; B Dodd
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Multiple mechanisms for recency with vowels and consonants.

Authors:  M W Battacchi; G M Pelamatti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05

10.  Perception of three-dimensional form by human infants.

Authors:  P J Kellman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  In search of a strong visual recency effect.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.

Authors:  Lance C Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

3.  Ineffectiveness of visual distinctiveness in enhancing immediate recall.

Authors:  J McDowd; S Madigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

4.  Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects.

Authors:  A M Glenberg; M Jona
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-09

5.  Visual distinctiveness can enhance recency effects.

Authors:  B H Bornstein; C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.