Literature DB >> 1453970

Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech.

B de Gelder1, J Vroomen.   

Abstract

Serial recall of lip-read, auditory, and audiovisual memory lists with and without a verbal suffix was examined. Recency effects were the same in the three presentation modalities. The disrupting effect of a suffix was largest when it was presented in the same modality as the list items. The results suggest that abstract linguistic as well as modality-specific codes play a role in memory for auditory and visual speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1453970     DOI: 10.3758/bf03199585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.

Authors:  G J Hitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

3.  Adding sound to lipread lists: the effects on serial recall of adding an auditory pulse train and a pure tone to silently lipread lists.

Authors:  R Campbell; J Garwood; S Rosen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-05

4.  Further evidence of interference between lipreading and auditory recency.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; S E Gathercole; V H Gregg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The modality effect and echoic persistence.

Authors:  O C Watkins; M J Watkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-09

6.  The acoustic correlates of "speechlike": a use of the suffix effect.

Authors:  J Morton; S M Marcus; P Ottley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-12

7.  Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.

Authors:  M A Shand; E S Klima
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1981-11

8.  Hearing by eye.

Authors:  R Campbell; B Dodd
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  The purity of auditory memory.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Face recognition and lipreading. A neurological dissociation.

Authors:  R Campbell; T Landis; M Regard
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  3 in total

1.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.

Authors:  Lance C Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

Review 2.  How the bimodal format of presentation affects working memory: an overview.

Authors:  Serena Mastroberardino; Valerio Santangelo; Fabiano Botta; Francesco S Marucci; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-10-12

3.  Beyond Recognition: Visual Contributions to Verbal Working Memory.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.674

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.