Literature DB >> 2266866

Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.

M W Battacchi1, G M Pelamatti, C Umiltà.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, four groups of 16 subjects performed ordered recall of six-syllable lists in both suffix and nonsuffix conditions. Sequential presentation of the lists varied for each group. In the auditory presentation, the syllables were delivered from one location only and were read aloud by the subjects. For the visual, spatially nondistributed presentation, the syllables appeared in one location only and were read silently. For visual, spatially distributed presentations, the syllables were spread out either vertically or horizontally and were read silently. Very robust recency and suffix effects were found in the auditory presentation, as well as in visual, spatially distributed presentations. In Experiment 2, 16 subjects performed ordered recall of visually presented lists with the items spread out vertically and conflicting spatial and temporal orders. A reliable recency effect was found for the final block of trials. In Experiment 3, 16 subjects performed ordered recall in the same conditions as in Experiment 2, except that they were instructed to recall the temporal order in which the spatial positions would be filled in. A bow-shaped curve and a strong recency effect were obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2266866     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.

Authors:  G J Hitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

2.  Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

3.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding.

Authors:  S W Keele; A Cohen; R Ivry; M Liotti; P Yee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.

Authors:  M A Shand; E S Klima
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1981-11

5.  Hearing by eye.

Authors:  R Campbell; B Dodd
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Spatial and temporal processing in the auditory and visual modalities.

Authors:  J Metcalfe; D Glavanov; M Murdock
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-07

7.  On the locus of the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  J S Nairne; R G Crowder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-07

8.  Some suffix effects on lipread lists.

Authors:  R Campbell; B Dodd
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-09

9.  Multiple mechanisms for recency with vowels and consonants.

Authors:  M W Battacchi; G M Pelamatti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05

10.  The purity of auditory memory.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  4 in total

1.  In search of a strong visual recency effect.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  Ineffectiveness of visual distinctiveness in enhancing immediate recall.

Authors:  J McDowd; S Madigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

3.  Visual distinctiveness can enhance recency effects.

Authors:  B H Bornstein; C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05

4.  Time, space, and memory for order.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.