Literature DB >> 729268

Conservative total hip arthroplasty: a procedure to conserve bone stock. Part I: analysis of sixty-six patients. Part II: analysis of failures.

W N Capello, P H Ireland, T R Trammell, P Eicher.   

Abstract

Pain relief, function, and range of motion in surface replacement hip arthroplasty is comparable to the Charnley-type conventional arthroplasty. Patients with primary and secondary degenerative hip disease are the most suitable candidates for surface replacement. Previous operations, especially mold arthroplasty, increases incidence of failure. Osteopenia, obesity, or congenital deficiency of the acetabulum also increases the incidence of failure. Intraoperative preservation of abductor continuity and rigorous postoperative abductor strengthening are necessary to insure the success of the procedure. A minimum of 18 months is necessary to adequately evaluate the procedure. Acetabular loosening is avoidable. Hemispherical reaming of the femoral head did not contribute to femoral component loosening. Traumatic femoral neck fracture is a concern, but atraumatic femoral neck fracture can be avoided through improved operative technique, and by a program of rehabilitation of hip musculature. The procedure is indicated in the relatively young, well-motivated, non-obese patient with degenerative joint disease who has normal hip musculature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 729268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

1.  Role of the extraosseus blood supply in osteoarthritic femoral heads?

Authors:  Ralf Schoeniger; Norman Espinosa; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Total hip replacement with Müller prosthesis and ICLH double cup. 2- to 6-year results of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  A Reigstad; M Brandt; K R Hetland
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986

4.  A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis.

Authors:  M C de Waal Malefijt; R Huiskes
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  [Early complication of the hip joint surface replacement according to Wagner (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Spranger; H Eder
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1980

6.  Porous surface replacement of the hip with chamfered-cylinder component.

Authors:  H Amstutz; D Kilgus; M Kabo; F Dorey
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1988

7.  Heterotopic bone formation following resurfacing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Merrill A Ritter; Matthew Galley
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-04-21

8.  Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Gayana Mahendra; Hemant Pandit; Karolina Kliskey; David Murray; Harinderjit Singh Gill; Nick Athanasou
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  [Development of hip resurfacing].

Authors:  H Rechl; H Pilge; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Serum and urine metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anastasia K Skipor; Patricia A Campbell; Leslie M Patterson; Harlan C Anstutz; Thomas P Schmalzried; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.