Literature DB >> 7288038

Signal and masker uncertainty in intensity discrimination.

M F Spiegel, M C Picardi, D M Green.   

Abstract

Intensity discrimination thresholds were assessed in a series of experiments. Signals were in-phase increments in the level of one component of a multitone masker. The main parameters of interest were the effects of signal uncertainty (which frequency is tested on a given trial) and masker uncertainty (which components were selected as the multitone masker on a given trial). Thresholds were measured as a function of signal frequency, number of components, and amount of overall changes in masker level. The results suggest a form of profile processing, in which the signal is detected by comparing levels in adjacent critical bands. Such a mechanism will account for the relatively small effects generally observed with signal uncertainty, for masker uncertainty showing larger effects on thresholds than signal uncertainty, and for the near constancy of signal threshold despite large (60 dB) fluctuations in overall level of the stimulus in the two intervals of the forced-choice trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7288038     DOI: 10.1121/1.386951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Excitation-based and informational masking of a tonal signal in a four-tone masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jack J Hitchens; Emily Buss; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influences of modulation and spatial separation on detection of a masked broadband target.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Limiting unwanted cues via random rove applied to the yes-no and multiple-alternative forced choice paradigms.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

7.  Informational masking of negative masking.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Children's detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers.

Authors:  E L Oh; F Wightman; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Children's detection of pure-tone signals: informational masking with contralateral maskers.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Michael R Callahan; Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Eunmi Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.