Literature DB >> 32113297

Informational masking of negative masking.

Christopher Conroy1, Christine R Mason1, Gerald Kidd1.   

Abstract

Negative masking (NM) is a ubiquitous finding in near-"threshold" psychophysics in which the detectability of a near-threshold signal improves when added to a copy of itself, i.e., a pedestal or masker. One interpretation of NM suggests that the pedestal acts as an informative cue, thereby reducing uncertainty and improving performance relative to detection in its absence. The purpose of this study was to test this hypothesis. Intensity discrimination thresholds were measured for 100-ms, 1000-Hz near-threshold tones. In the reference condition, thresholds were measured in quiet (no masker other than the pedestal). In comparison conditions, thresholds were measured in the presence of one of two additional maskers: a notched-noise masker or a random-frequency multitone masker. The additional maskers were intended to cause different amounts of uncertainty and, in turn, to differentially influence NM. The results were generally consistent with an uncertainty-based interpretation of NM: NM was found both in quiet and in notched-noise, yet it was eliminated by the multitone masker. A competing interpretation of NM based on nonlinear transduction does not account for all of the results. Profile analysis may have been a factor in performance and this suggests that NM may be attributable to, or influenced by, multiple mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32113297      PMCID: PMC7004829          DOI: 10.1121/10.0000652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Strategies used to detect auditory signals in small sets of random maskers.

Authors:  B A Wright; K Saberi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Examination of a linear model in an informational masking study.

Authors:  Zhongzhou Tang; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  The history of dipper functions.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection and intensity discrimination of a sinusoid.

Authors:  T E Hanna; S M von Gierke; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

8.  Effective properties of multicomponent simultaneous maskers under conditions of uncertainty.

Authors:  D L Neff; B P Callaghan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection.

Authors:  D J Lasley; T E Cohn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold.

Authors:  R D Patterson; I Nimmo-Smith; D L Weber; R Milroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Uncertainty about amplitude eliminates negative masking in a pure-tone amplitude discrimination experiment.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.