Literature DB >> 19640017

Limiting unwanted cues via random rove applied to the yes-no and multiple-alternative forced choice paradigms.

Huanping Dai1, Gerald Kidd.   

Abstract

When a random rove is used in a perceptual task to control the influence of an unwanted cue that may confound the decision strategy of primary interest, the effectiveness of the rove is determined by its range. Green [Profile Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988)] provided a formula which allows experimenters to determine the roving range required to ensure that the listeners relying on the unwanted cue cannot exceed a pre-defined percentage of correct responses in a two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice experiment. Here, Green's analysis is extended to the yes-no and m-alternative, forced-choice paradigms (m>2).

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19640017      PMCID： PMC2728343          DOI： 10.1121/1.3175882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN： 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Auditory detection of hollowness.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A new technique for measuring spectral shape discrimination.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory intensity perception: successive versus simultaneous, across-channel discriminations.

Authors:  H Dai; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of spectral changes in multi-tone complexes.

Authors:  N J Versfeld; A J Houtsma
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

6.  Auditory profile analysis: potential pitch cues.

Authors:  V M Richards; Z A Onsan; D M Green
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  A composite randomization procedure for measuring spectral shape discrimination.

Authors:  G Kidd; H Dai
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination.

Authors:  T M Shackleton; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Signal and masker uncertainty in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  M F Spiegel; M C Picardi; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Frequency discrimination of random-amplitude tones.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 1.840
View more
  4 in total

1.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.

Authors:  U-Cheng Leong; Douglas M Schwarz; Kenneth S Henry; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.