Literature DB >> 722256

Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries.

S E Palmer, K Hemenway.   

Abstract

Time to detect bilateral symmetry in different orientations was studied for closed polygons with single, double, quadruple, rotational, and near symmetry. In Experiment 1, the orientation of the axis of symmetry was varied. Detection was fastest for vertical symmetry, next fastest for horizontal, and slowest for left- and right-diagonal symmetries. For corresponding orientations, responses were faster to quadruple than double symmetries, and faster to double than single symmetries. Negative responses to nearly symmetric figures produced an orientation effect similar to that for single symmetries. Rotational symmetries showed no orientation effect and took longer to reject than near symmetries. In Experiment 2, subjects looked only for vertical symmetry. Responses were twice as fast as in comparable conditions of Experiment 1. The effect of multiple symmetries was still present, but rotational symmetries were rejected faster than near symmetries. The results are interpreted as supporting a dual process model for detecting symmetry in multiple orientation channels: Observers first select potential axes of symmetry defined by mirror-similar parts and then evaluate specific axes sequentially in a detailed comparison for mirror-identity.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 722256     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.4.4.691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  32 in total

1.  The role of symmetry in determining perceived centers within shapes.

Authors:  M Davi; M A Doyle; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  Are there capacity limitations in symmetry perception?

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler; Justin A Junge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

3.  No symmetry advantage when object matching involves accidental viewpoints.

Authors:  Arno Koning; Rob van Lier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-10-07

4.  Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters; Kieran Lee; M Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The dynamic-stimulus advantage of visual symmetry perception.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Katsumi Watanabe; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-01-24

6.  Concavities count for less in symmetry perception.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

7.  Location memory biases reveal the challenges of coordinating visual and kinesthetic reference frames.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Clayton Peterson; Warren Darling; John P Spencer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Detection of symmetry in tachistoscopically presented dot patterns: effects of multiple axes and skewing.

Authors:  J Wagemans; L Van Gool; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11

Review 10.  Reflections in art.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Jessica Chao; Dina Wang
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.