Literature DB >> 15480756

No symmetry advantage when object matching involves accidental viewpoints.

Arno Koning1, Rob van Lier.   

Abstract

The presupposed advantage of symmetrical objects over asymmetrical objects was investigated in an object matching task, using accidental and non-accidental viewpoints. In addition, the accidental views could be symmetric or asymmetric. When two non-accidental views were presented, symmetrical objects were matched faster than asymmetrical objects. When an accidental view was presented first (followed by a non-accidental view), the matching of symmetrical objects was equal to that of asymmetrical objects. When a non-accidental view was presented first (followed by an accidental view), matching was again equal for the symmetrical and asymmetrical objects, although much faster compared with the opposite sequence of presented views. No effects of image symmetry in the accidental viewpoints were found. Apparently, the advantage of symmetrical objects over asymmetrical objects is only present in object matching when 3-D object structures are visible.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480756     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0191-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  15 in total

Review 1.  Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation.

Authors:  M Bar
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Matching multicomponent objects from different viewpoints: mental rotation as normalization?

Authors:  B Willems; J Wagemans
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming.

Authors:  Mary-Ellen Large; Patricia A McMullen; Jeff P Hamm
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

4.  View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects.

Authors:  R Lawson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-08

Review 5.  Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach.

Authors:  P A van der Helm; E L Leeuwenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.

Authors:  R Lawson
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-09

7.  Horizontal-vertical structure in the visual comparison of rigidly transformed patterns.

Authors:  J I Kahn; D H Foster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Detection of visual symmetries.

Authors:  J Wagemans
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1995

9.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries.

Authors:  S E Palmer; K Hemenway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays.

Authors:  H B Barlow; B C Reeves
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid processing of closure and viewpoint-invariant symmetry: behavioral criteria for feedforward processing.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.