Literature DB >> 18214531

The dynamic-stimulus advantage of visual symmetry perception.

Ryosuke Niimi1, Katsumi Watanabe, Kazuhiko Yokosawa.   

Abstract

It has been speculated that visual symmetry perception from dynamic stimuli involves mechanisms different from those for static stimuli. However, previous studies found no evidence that dynamic stimuli lead to active temporal processing and improve symmetry detection. In this study, four psychophysical experiments investigated temporal processing in symmetry perception using both dynamic and static stimulus presentations of dot patterns. In Experiment 1, rapid successive presentations of symmetric patterns (e.g., 16 patterns per 853 ms) produced more accurate discrimination of orientations of symmetry axes than static stimuli (single pattern presented through 853 ms). In Experiments 2-4, we confirmed that the dynamic-stimulus advantage depended upon presentation of a large number of unique patterns within a brief period (853 ms) in the dynamic conditions. Evidently, human vision takes advantage of temporal processing for symmetry perception from dynamic stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18214531     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0133-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  34 in total

1.  Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals.

Authors:  J Ross; D R Badcock; A Hayes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The symmetry magnification function varies with detection task.

Authors:  C W Tyler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The effects of opposite-polarity dipoles on the detection of Glass patterns.

Authors:  David Burr; John Ross
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Detection of symmetry in tachistoscopically presented dot patterns: effects of multiple axes and skewing.

Authors:  J Wagemans; L Van Gool; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11

5.  Local and global factors affecting the coherent motion of gratings presented in multiple apertures.

Authors:  D Alais; M J van der Smagt; A V van den Berg; W A van de Grind
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

7.  Multiple mechanisms for the detection of mirror symmetry.

Authors:  C W Tyler; L Hardage; R T Miller
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1995

8.  Component processes in the perception of bilaterally symmetric dot textures.

Authors:  B Jenkins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-11

9.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J A Movshon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Repetition blindness: out of sight or out of mind?

Authors:  Alison L Morris; Catherine L Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of motion and number of element locations in mirror symmetry perception.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sharman; Elena Gheorghiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Temporal dynamics of mirror-symmetry perception.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sharman; Sebastian Gregersen; Elena Gheorghiu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Electrophysiological evidence of the amodal representation of symmetry in extrastriate areas.

Authors:  Giulia Rampone; Martyna Adam; Alexis D J Makin; John Tyson-Carr; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.