Literature DB >> 18229499

Concavities count for less in symmetry perception.

Johan Hulleman1, Christian N L Olivers.   

Abstract

We investigated the relative importance of convexities (protrusions) and concavities (indentations) for the perception of shape. On the one hand, it has been suggested that convexities determine the shape of an object, whereas concavities merely act as "perceptual glue" between t he convexities. On the other hand, it hasbeen argued that concavities are more salient than convexities. We show that participants find it easier to detect asymmetry in a 2-D silhouette when there is a mismatch between the shapes of convexities on either side of the axis of symmetry than when there is a mismatch between the shapes o f concavities. This is the case even whenthe concavities are closest to the axis of symmetry, and despite the usual bias toward this axis in symmetry perception. We suggest that the actual shape of concavities is less important in symmetry perception, because the main role of concavities is to act as part boundaries in the representation of the shape of objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18229499     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Concavities as basic features in visual search: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  J Hulleman; W te Winkel; F Boselie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-01

2.  What change detection tells us about the visual representation of shape.

Authors:  Elias H Cohen; Elan Barenholtz; Manish Singh; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Tracy Farrant
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2005-04-14

4.  Symmetry and selective attention: a dissociation between effortless perception and serial search.

Authors:  C N Olivers; P A van der Helm
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-10

Review 5.  Detection of visual symmetries.

Authors:  J Wagemans
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1995

6.  Parts of recognition.

Authors:  D D Hoffman; W A Richards
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

7.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries.

Authors:  S E Palmer; K Hemenway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays.

Authors:  H B Barlow; B C Reeves
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Visual attention and objects: one versus two or convex versus concave?

Authors:  B S Gibson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

2.  Shape recognition: convexities, concavities and things in between.

Authors:  Gunnar Schmidtmann; Ben J Jennings; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.