Literature DB >> 16812761

Delayed matching-to-sample performance of hens: Effects of sample duration and response requirements during the sample.

T M Foster, W Temple, C Mackenzie, L R Demello, A Poling.   

Abstract

Six domestic hens were trained under a delayed matching-to-sample procedure with red and green keylights as sample and comparison stimuli and a 1.5-s delay interval. The hens were trained to stop pecking the sample stimuli when a tone sounded. Duration of the sample stimuli (2 to 10 s) and the number of pecks required on the key on which these stimuli were presented (0 to 10) were altered across conditions. Both the response requirement on the sample key and the duration of sample presentations affected accuracy. These findings are in agreement with those of earlier studies using other species and somewhat different procedures.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16812761      PMCID: PMC1349834          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task.

Authors:  L R Demello; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of fixed-ratio sample and choice response requirements upon oddity matching.

Authors:  T Lydersen; D Perkins; H Chairez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Temporal factors influencing the pigeon's successive matching-to-sample performance: sample duration, intertrial interval, and retention interval.

Authors:  K R Nelson; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: delayed-pair-comparison procedures and some results.

Authors:  C P Shimp; M Moffitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Does effort play a role in the effect of response requirements on delayed matching to sample?

Authors:  M L Spetch; D Treit
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effect of increased response requirements on discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task.

Authors:  L R DeMello; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons.

Authors:  W A Roberts; P J Kraemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-10
  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Brief presentations are sufficient for pigeons to discriminate arrays of same and different stimuli.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young; Jessie J Peissig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of reinforcer delays on the form of the forgetting function.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent second-order schedules: some effects of variations in response number and duration.

Authors:  Diane M Sealey; Catherine E Sumpter; W Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Seasonal variation in pigeon body weight and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; Ian G McLean; Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Titrating-delay matching-to-sample in the pigeon.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Manish Vaidya; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Cognitive abilities in Malawi cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.): matching-to-sample and image/mirror-image discriminations.

Authors:  Stefanie Gierszewski; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken.

Authors:  Lori Marino
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 9.  Factors Influencing Individual Variation in Farm Animal Cognition and How to Account for These Statistically.

Authors:  Emily V Bushby; Mary Friel; Conor Goold; Helen Gray; Lauren Smith; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-08-17

10.  Cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus perform above chance in a "matching-to-sample" experiment.

Authors:  Mélisande Aellen; Ulrike E Siebeck; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.