Literature DB >> 7168442

Dynamic and static lifting capacity and muscular strength of steelmill workers.

E Kamon, D Kiser, J L Pytel.   

Abstract

Dynamic and static strength measurements were compared respectively to maximal actual lifting and to a static lifting strength of 228 male steelmill workers. The strength tests were reasonably correlated with the lifting measurements. The dynamic strength test was the simplest, the least time consuming, revealing one to one ratio with the maximal actual lift and was not perceived as an exerting maneuver. Therefore, when matching between the job and a worker is desirable, it is suggested to use the dynamic strength test as a predictor for lifting capacity.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7168442     DOI: 10.1080/15298668291410684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  5 in total

Review 1.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity.

Authors:  I Jacobs; D G Bell; J Pope
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

3.  The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.

Authors:  D M Fothergill; D W Grieve; A D Pinder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

4.  Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component.

Authors:  T Hortobagyi; F I Katch; P F LaChance
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

5.  Concurrent validity of an isokinetic lift test used for admission to the Swedish Armed Forces.

Authors:  Tony Bohman; Matthias Tegern; Alexandra Halvarsson; Lisbet Broman; Helena Larsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.