Literature DB >> 3349979

Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity.

I Jacobs1, D G Bell, J Pope.   

Abstract

This study compared the relationship between isokinetic lifting test (ILT) performance and a maximal operational lifting test (OLT) with that between an isoinertial progressive lifting test (PLT) and OLT. Fifty subjects performed the ILT, PLT and OLT after familiarization trials. OLT was defined as the weight of the heaviest crate that could be lifted to 1.34 m with a progressive, incremental test. ILT performance was the force generated during a single maximal simulated lift on an isokinetic dynamometer. PLT performance was the maximal weight lifted to 1.52 m with a progressive, incremental protocol on a weight stack. OLT was highly correlated with ILT (r = 0.96) and PLT (r = 0.97); the standard error was similar for both linear regression equations. The results demonstrate that a single maximal voluntary lift on an isokinetic dynamometer is as good a predictor of OLT as in the PLT presently used in military recruit centers.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3349979     DOI: 10.1007/bf00640654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  9 in total

1.  Isometric and isokinetic testing of lifting strength of males in teamwork.

Authors:  W Karwowski; A Mital
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths.

Authors:  A Mital; W Karwowski; A K Mazouz; E Orsarh
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1986-05

3.  Modelling of maximum acceptable load of lifting by physical factors.

Authors:  B C Jiang; M M Ayoub
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  An isoinertial technique to assess individual lifting capability.

Authors:  K H Kroemer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Three-dimensional dynamic strength measuring device: a prototype.

Authors:  A Mital; R Vinayagamoorhty
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1984-12

6.  Preemployment strength testing: an updated position.

Authors:  D B Chaffin; G D Herrin; W M Keyserling
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1978-06

7.  A comparison of dynamic- and static-strength models for prediction of lifting capacity.

Authors:  F Aghazadeh; M M Ayoub
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Dynamic strength test as a predictor for maximal and acceptable lifting.

Authors:  J L Pytel; E Kamon
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Dynamic and static lifting capacity and muscular strength of steelmill workers.

Authors:  E Kamon; D Kiser; J L Pytel
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1982-11
  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Authors:  David M Frost; John Cronin; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Effect of computerized instructions on measurement of lift capacity: Safety, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  L N Matheson; R Danner; J Grant; V Mooney
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-06

4.  The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.

Authors:  D M Fothergill; D W Grieve; A D Pinder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

5.  Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component.

Authors:  T Hortobagyi; F I Katch; P F LaChance
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

6.  Concurrent validity of an isokinetic lift test used for admission to the Swedish Armed Forces.

Authors:  Tony Bohman; Matthias Tegern; Alexandra Halvarsson; Lisbet Broman; Helena Larsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.