Literature DB >> 2737196

Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component.

T Hortobagyi1, F I Katch, P F LaChance.   

Abstract

Two studies were conducted in 83 college men to determine the degree of generality of individual differences in upper body muscular strength assessed by different testing modes. In study 1 (N = 43), correlations were computed between four measures of upper body strength using the bench press movement, maximal isokinetic (0.09 rad.s-1), maximal fast (0.126 m.s-1) and slow (0.037 m.s-1) hydraulic, and one repetition maximum (1-RM) free weight bench press (BP). Compared to free weight BP, maximal strength during isokinetic and slow hydraulic BP was approximately 29% and approximately 8% larger, and fast hydraulic BP strength was approximately 63% lower (p less than 0.05). Simple linear regression of isokinetic BP on 1-RM BP yielded r = 0.79, error of prediction (SE) = 12%, and generality = 81%. The corresponding averaged values for the regression of slow and fast hydraulic BP on free weight 1-RM BP were r = 0.77, SE = 13.5%, and generality = 84%. In Study 2 (N = 40), testing included maximal isokinetic concentric and eccentric arm flexion and extension at 0.524, 1.570, and 2.094 rad.s-1. The ratio of concentric to eccentric torque at the 3 speeds averaged 0.68 (flexion) and 0.70 (extension), and eccentric torques were 32% and 30% greater than concentric torques (p less than 0.05). The linear regression between concentric vs. eccentric flexion and extension torques at the three velocities yielded an average r = 0.80, SE = 13.7%, and generality = 73%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2737196     DOI: 10.1007/bf00637387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  24 in total

1.  Effects of simultaneous training for strength and endurance on upper and lower body strength and running performance.

Authors:  T Hortobágyi; F I Katch; P F Lachance
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  The relation between force and velocity in human muscle.

Authors:  D R WILKIE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Isokinetic and isometric torque force relationships.

Authors:  L R Osternig; B T Bates; S T James
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Reliability of measurements of concentric and eccentric isokinetic loading.

Authors:  T J Tredinnick; P W Duncan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1988-05

5.  Differences in elbow flexion torque measured concentrically, eccentrically, and isometrically.

Authors:  J W Griffin
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1987-08

6.  Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths.

Authors:  A Mital; W Karwowski; A K Mazouz; E Orsarh
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1986-05

7.  Concentric and eccentric torque comparisons for knee extension and flexion in young adult males and females using the Kinetic Communicator.

Authors:  C L Highgenboten; A W Jackson; N B Meske
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Relationship between isometric and isotonic strength.

Authors:  B R Carlson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Activity of motor units during concentric and eccentric contractions.

Authors:  T Moritani; S Muramatsu; M Muro
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1987-12

10.  Isokinetic, isometric and isotonic strength relationships.

Authors:  J J Knapik; J E Wright; R H Mawdsley; J M Braun
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  12 in total

1.  Differences in morphology and force/velocity relationship between Senegalese and Italian sprinters.

Authors:  Abderrehmane Rahmani; Elio Locatelli; Jean-Rene Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Authors:  David M Frost; John Cronin; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  A new approach to rowing ergometry: establishing exercise intensity relative to maximum force output.

Authors:  R L Jensen; F I Katch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

4.  A comparison of the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity between pneumatic and free weight resistance.

Authors:  David Michael Frost; John Barry Cronin; Robert Usher Newton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Progressive load training for the quadriceps muscle associated with proprioception exercises for the prevention of falls in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L E P P Teixeira; K N G Silva; A M Imoto; T J P Teixeira; A H Kayo; R Montenegro-Rodrigues; M S Peccin; V F M Trevisani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges.

Authors:  P Abernethy; G Wilson; P Logan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  The specificity of strength training: the effect of posture.

Authors:  G J Wilson; A J Murphy; A Walshe
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

8.  The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.

Authors:  D M Fothergill; D W Grieve; A D Pinder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

9.  The Generality of Strength: Relationship between Different Measures of Muscular Strength in Older Women.

Authors:  JoÃo Pedro Nunes; Paolo M Cunha; Melissa Antunes; Bruna D V Costa; Witalo Kassiano; Gabriel Kunevaliki; Alex S Ribeiro; Edilson S Cyrino
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

10.  Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength.

Authors:  D Baker; G Wilson; B Carlyon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.