Literature DB >> 12468745

Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

J Bos1, P P F M Kuijer, M H W Frings-Dresen.   

Abstract

AIMS: (1) To find a universal strategy for the identification of specific demands of a job or task, focusing on occupations in which there may be an increased risk for health complaints owing to these specific demands. (2) To select reliable and valid tests concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling, which consider the relation between occupational work demands and the assessment of the maximally acceptable load on an individual level.
METHODS: Literature search was performed using Medline (1988 to May 2001), Embase (1966 to May 2001), and NIOSHTIC (1971-98).
RESULTS: No universal strategy was found for the definition of specific occupational demands. Therefore a "three step strategy" was formulated for defining specific occupational demands in a job or a task in order to prevent health complaints on an individual level. Many tests were found in the literature concerning lifting, but only a few concerning pushing and pulling. None of the tests concerning pushing, pulling, or lifting considered the relation between work demands and the assessment of the maximally acceptable load on an individual level. Furthermore, none of the tests met the criteria of reliability and prognostic value for musculoskeletal complaints completely. Only for the prognostic value of relative strength capacity tests concerning pushing pulling and lifting, did there appear to be limited proof for the development of musculoskeletal complaints.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, for the prevention of work related health complaints, it can be suggested that more attention should be paid to: (1) the definition of specific occupational demands; (2) the assessment of specific occupational demands; and (3) the quality of tests for specific occupational demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12468745      PMCID: PMC1763594          DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.12.800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  58 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population.

Authors:  M A Jay; J M Lamb; R L Watson; I A Young; F J Fearon; J M Alday; A G Tindall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Detecting sincerity of effort: a summary of methods and approaches.

Authors:  D E Lechner; S F Bradbury; L A Bradley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08

3.  An isoinertial predictor for maximal acceptable lifting weights of Chinese male subjects.

Authors:  Y H Lee; Y L Chen
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1996-05

Review 4.  Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders.

Authors:  A Burdorf; G Sorock
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Estimates of weight that subjects can lift frequently in functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  R L Saunders; K L Beissner; B G McManis
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-12

6.  Psychophysical acceptability as a constraint in manual working capacity.

Authors:  S H Snook
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.

Authors:  T R Waters; V Putz-Anderson; A Garg; L J Fine
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Measuring residual functional capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; E Abdel-Moty; R Cutler; T M Khalil; S Sadek; R S Rosomoff; H L Rosomoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Validity of the dictionary of occupational titles residual functional capacity battery.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; R B Cutler; H Rosomoff; T Khalil; E Abdel-Moty; R Steele-Rosomoff
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part III: Isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity.

Authors:  L Curtis; T G Mayer; R J Gatchel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure: a brief review and recommendations.

Authors:  Ileana L Piña
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Self-reported work ability and work performance in workers with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Haitze J de Vries; Michiel F Reneman; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

3.  A trial of a job-specific workers' health surveillance program for construction workers: study protocol.

Authors:  Julitta S Boschman; Henk F van der Molen; Cor van Duivenbooden; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review.

Authors:  P P F M Kuijer; V Gouttebarge; S Brouwer; M F Reneman; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  A new pre-employment functional capacity evaluation predicts longer-term risk of musculoskeletal injury in healthy workers: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Legge; Robin Burgess-Limerick; Geeske Peeters
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups.

Authors:  Stefanie Brighenti-Zogg; Jonas Mundwiler; Ulla Schüpbach; Thomas Dieterle; David Paul Wolfer; Jörg Daniel Leuppi; David Miedinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.