Literature DB >> 8925813

The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.

D M Fothergill1, D W Grieve, A D Pinder.   

Abstract

Dynamic lifting strength was assessed at lift velocities ranging from 0 to 1 m.s-1 using a hydrodynamometer in which the viscous resistance to motion could be preset. Nine men and nine women performed one- and two-handed dynamic exertions against low, medium, and high resistances. The subjects were required to lift as forcefully and as fast as possible from a height of 400 mm to just above head height. The instantaneous forces recorded at knee, knuckle, hip, shoulder, elbow, and head heights were compared with those obtained during maximal one- and two-handed isometric lifts performed at the same heights. The position of peak force relative to stature was lower for one-handed lifts (35.9% of stature) than for two-handed lifts (38.4% of stature) (P < 0.005), but was unaffected by lift resistance (P > 0.05) and subject sex (P > 0.05). Lifting forces during two-handed exertions were on average 1.5 times greater than for one-handed exertions (P < 0.0001). However, the difference in the strength of one- and two-handed lifts was highly dependent on hand height (P < 0.0001) and task resistance (P < 0.005), and was greater for the men than for the women (P < 0.001). When static lifting strength was measured at heights relative to stature and normalized by dividing by body weight, there was no significant difference in performance between the men and the women [mean normalized female:male: (f:m) strength ratio = 0.76, P > 0.05]. Under dynamic conditions the sex difference in lifting performance was pronounced (mean normalized f:m strength ratio = 0.68, P < 0.01), especially for power output (mean f:m power.unit body weight-1 ratio = 0.52, P < 0.005). The proportion of generality (r2 x 100) between dynamic and static lifting strength was found to range between 63% and 87%. These data suggest that the dynamic and static tests of lifting strength measured a common, intrinsic ability to produce maximal lifting forces. The finding that sex differences in strength are dependent on whether the exertion is static or dynamic has important implications for biomechanical models of human strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8925813     DOI: 10.1007/bf00242272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  20 in total

1.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.

Authors:  S H Snook; V M Ciriello
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  The relation between force and velocity in human muscle.

Authors:  D R WILKIE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Isometric and isokinetic testing of lifting strength of males in teamwork.

Authors:  W Karwowski; A Mital
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The role of learning and coordination in strength training.

Authors:  O M Rutherford; D A Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

5.  Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths.

Authors:  A Mital; W Karwowski; A K Mazouz; E Orsarh
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1986-05

6.  Influence of dynamic factors on the lumbar spine moment in lifting.

Authors:  C Bush-Joseph; O Schipplein; G B Andersson; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing.

Authors:  L S Caldwell; D B Chaffin; F N Dukes-Dobos; K H Kroemer; L L Laubach; S H Snook; D E Wasserman
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1974-04

Review 8.  Similarities and dissimilarities between static and dynamic exercise.

Authors:  E Asmussen
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Dynamic and static lifting capacity and muscular strength of steelmill workers.

Authors:  E Kamon; D Kiser; J L Pytel
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1982-11

10.  The measurement and prediction of isometric lifting strength in symmetrical and asymmetrical postures.

Authors:  D Sanchez; D W Grieve
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.