Literature DB >> 7151849

The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain.

R A Seymour.   

Abstract

Two 10 cm visual analogue scales were compared with a 0-10 point numerical rating scale and a four-point verbal descriptive scale, in assessing pain severity in twelve patients with post-operative pain following removal of an impacted lower third molar. High correlations were shown between the pain scores from the two visual analogue scales and the numerical scale, but a lower correlation was obtained when the four-point scale was compared with the other scales. Analgesic efficacy was found to be dependent on the type of scale used. The 10 cm visual analogue scale was more sensitive than other pain scales and could discriminate between small changes in pain intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7151849     DOI: 10.1007/bf00605995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  15 in total

1.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Edgar E Ohnhaus; Rolf Adler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Clinical consequences of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar.

Authors:  A V van Gool; J J Ten Bosch; G Boering
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1977-02

4.  Studies with pain rating scales.

Authors:  W W Downie; P A Leatham; V M Rhind; V Wright; J A Branco; J A Anderson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain.

Authors:  C R Joyce; D W Zutshi; V Hrubes; R M Mason
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-08-14       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Bilateral surgical removal of impacted lower third molar teeth as a model for drug evaluation: a test with ibuprofen.

Authors:  P Lökken; I Olsen; I Bruaset; K Norman-Pedersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-04-04       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  A model to evaluate mild analgesics in oral surgery outpatients.

Authors:  S A Cooper; W T Beaver
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of aspirin in post-operative dental pain.

Authors:  R A Seymour; M D Rawlins
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement.

Authors:  E Kremer; J H Atkinson; R J Ignelzi
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Assessment of analgesics in dental surgery outpatients.

Authors:  B von Graffenried; E Nüesch; B Maeglin; W Hägler; M Kuhn
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  35 in total

1.  Severe pain confounds neuropsychological test performance.

Authors:  E J Heyer; R Sharma; C J Winfree; J Mocco; D J McMahon; P A McCormick; D O Quest; J G McMurtry; C J Riedel; R M Lazar; Y Stern; E S Connolly
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  Evaluation of algesimetric parameters on the basis of tooth pulp stimulation in humans.

Authors:  P Rohdewald; V Keuth
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb

3.  Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using "the PainVision™ system" for quantitative analysis of pain sensation.

Authors:  Masayuki Hiraki; Ichiro Takemasa; Mamoru Uemura; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Efficacy of Benzocaine 20% Topical Anesthetic Compared to Placebo Prior to Administration of Local Anesthesia in the Oral Cavity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Guilherme Camponogara de Freiras; Roselaine Terezinha Pozzobon; Diego Segatto Blaya; Carlos Heitor Moreira
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015

5.  Use of Pre-Injection Diffusion of Local Anaesthetic as a Means of Reducing Needle Penetration Discomfort.

Authors:  Ozgur Onder Kuscu; Nuket Sandalli; Esber Caglar; John G Meechan
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-09

6.  Evaluation of Surgical Pleth Index and Analgesia Nociception Index as surrogate pain measures in conscious postoperative patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Lee; Byung-Moon Choi; Yu-Ri Jung; Yong-Hun Lee; Ji-Yeon Bang; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Premedication with lorazepam before bone marrow biopsy.

Authors:  D W Milligan; M R Howard; A Judd
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Less IS less: a randomised controlled trial comparing cautious and rapid nalbuphine dosing regimens.

Authors:  M Woollard; R Whitfield; K Smith; T Jones; G Thomas; G Thomas; C Hinton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment.

Authors:  Barbara Rakel; Nicholas Cooper; Heather J Adams; Bryan R Messer; Laura A Frey Law; Douglas R Dannen; Carrie A Miller; Anya C Polehna; Rachelle C Ruggle; Carol G T Vance; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Self- and proxy report for the assessment of pain in patients with and without cognitive impairment: experiences gained in a geriatric hospital.

Authors:  A Lukas; T Niederecker; I Günther; B Mayer; T Nikolaus
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.