Literature DB >> 7267140

Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement.

E Kremer, J H Atkinson, R J Ignelzi.   

Abstract

Chronic pain patients reported pain intensity on each of 3 pain intensity scales, the visual analog, numerical and adjectival scales, and then ranked the scales in order of perceived best communication of pain intensity. All patients were able to complete an adjectival scale but 11% were unable to complete a visual analog scale and 2% failed at a numeric scale. The intensity of the pain ratings on the 3 scales were significantly correlated and there were no reliable differences in reported intensity as a function of preference. Pain intensity was reliably higher on each scale for depressed-anxious patients as compared to non-depressed/non-anxious patients. Patients completing all 3 scales indicated a significant preference for the adjectival scale but the basis for this preference did not appear related to sex, etiology of pain, affective variables nor selected psychological variables. These data indicate that pain scale preference does not influence pain intensity report. Nevertheless, there are some clinical situations in which a numeric scale is likely to yield a better measure of pain intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7267140     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  59 in total

1.  Evaluation of algesimetric parameters on the basis of tooth pulp stimulation in humans.

Authors:  P Rohdewald; V Keuth
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb

2.  Conservative treatment for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: platelet-rich plasma and focused shock waves. A retrospective study.

Authors:  Davide Erroi; Matilde Sigona; Tania Suarez; Donatella Trischitta; Antonio Pavan; Maria Chiara Vulpiani; Mario Vetrano
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

Review 3.  Pain assessment.

Authors:  Mathias Haefeli; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cumulative risk across family stressors: short- and long-term effects for adolescents.

Authors:  R Forehand; H Biggar; B A Kotchick
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1998-04

5.  Breast Cancer EDGE Task Force Outcomes: Clinical Measures of Pain.

Authors:  Shana Harrington; Laura Gilchrist; Antoinette Sander
Journal:  Rehabil Oncol       Date:  2014

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the German version of the spinal stenosis measure.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Johann Steurer; Lukas M Wildi; Ulrike Held
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Mechanism-driven phase I translational study of trifluoperazine in adults with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Robert E Molokie; Diana J Wilkie; Harriett Wittert; Marie L Suarez; Yingwei Yao; Zhongsheng Zhao; Ying He; Zaijie J Wang
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Comparison of numerical and verbal rating scales to measure pain exacerbations in patients with chronic cancer pain.

Authors:  Cinzia Brunelli; Ernesto Zecca; Cinzia Martini; Tiziana Campa; Elena Fagnoni; Michela Bagnasco; Luigi Lanata; Augusto Caraceni
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety.

Authors:  Valerie S L Williams; Robert J Morlock; Douglas Feltner
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Pain reports by older hospice cancer patients and family caregivers: the role of cognitive functioning.

Authors:  Rebecca S Allen; William E Haley; Brent J Small; Susan C McMillan
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2002-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.