Literature DB >> 19945354

A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment.

Barbara Rakel1, Nicholas Cooper, Heather J Adams, Bryan R Messer, Laura A Frey Law, Douglas R Dannen, Carrie A Miller, Anya C Polehna, Rachelle C Ruggle, Carol G T Vance, Deirdre M Walsh, Kathleen A Sluka.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study compared a new transient sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) that delivers current for 45 seconds to an inactive sham and active TENS to determine the degree of blinding and influence on pain reduction. Pressure-pain thresholds (PPT), heat-pain thresholds (HPT), and pain intensities to tonic heat and pressure were measured in 69 healthy adults before and after randomization. Allocation investigators and subjects were asked to identify the treatment administered. The transient sham blinded investigators 100% of the time and 40% of subjects compared to the inactive sham that blinded investigators 0% of the time and 21% of subjects. Investigators and subjects were blinded only 7% and 13% of the time, respectively, with active TENS. Neither placebo treatment resulted in significant changes in PPT, HPT, or pain intensities. Subjects using higher active TENS amplitudes (> or =17 mAs) had significantly higher PPTs and lower pain intensities to tonic pressure than subjects using lower amplitudes (<17 mAs). HPTs and pain intensities to tonic heat were not significantly changed. The transient TENS completely blinds investigators to treatment and does not reduce pain, thereby providing a true placebo treatment. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the benefits of a new transient sham TENS device for use in prospective, randomized, clinical trials. This device facilitates blinding of subjects and investigators to eliminate expectation bias and determine the true efficacy of TENS for use in clinical populations. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945354      PMCID: PMC2922105          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  43 in total

Review 1.  When is a placebo effect not an effect?

Authors:  Richard Wigley
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Effects of simultaneous dual-site TENS stimulation on experimental pain.

Authors:  Leica S Claydon; Linda S Chesterton; Panos Barlas; Julius Sim
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Placebo effects on human mu-opioid activity during pain.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; David J Scott; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Is mechanical pain threshold after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increased locally and unilaterally? A randomized placebo-controlled trial in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Reidar Aarskog; Mark I Johnson; Jan Hendrik Demmink; Anne Lofthus; Vegard Iversen; Rodrigo Lopes-Martins; Jon Joensen; Jan M Bjordal
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2007-12

5.  Increase of the heat pain threshold during and after high-frequency transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in a group of normal subjects.

Authors:  M Buonocore; N Camuzzini
Journal:  Eura Medicophys       Date:  2006-10-03

6.  An investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of TENS delivered by a glove electrode.

Authors:  Stephen Cowan; Joanne McKenna; Evie McCrum-Gardner; Mark I Johnson; Kathleen A Sluka; Deirdre M Walsh
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Predicting outcome of TENS in chronic pain: a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Oosterhof; Han J A Samwel; Theo M de Boo; Oliver H G Wilder-Smith; Rob A B Oostendorp; Ben J P Crul
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Alternating frequencies of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: does it produce greater analgesic effects on mechanical and thermal pain thresholds?

Authors:  K C Tong; Sing Kai Lo; Gladys L Cheing
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Placebo and nocebo effects are defined by opposite opioid and dopaminergic responses.

Authors:  David J Scott; Christian S Stohler; Christine M Egnatuk; Heng Wang; Robert A Koeppe; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02

10.  The influence of expectation on spinal manipulation induced hypoalgesia: an experimental study in normal subjects.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Michael E Robinson; Josh A Barabas; Steven Z George
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence.

Authors:  Carol G T Vance; Dana L Dailey; Barbara A Rakel; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2014-05

2.  What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature.

Authors:  Kathleen A Sluka; Jan M Bjordal; Serge Marchand; Barbara A Rakel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-05-02

3.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and conditioned pain modulation influence the perception of pain in humans.

Authors:  R E Liebano; C G Vance; B A Rakel; J E Lee; N A Cooper; S Marchand; D M Walsh; K A Sluka
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain, Pulmonary Function, and Respiratory Muscle Strength After Posterolateral Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hermann H Husch; Guilherme Watte; Matheus Zanon; Gabriel Sartori Pacini; Daniella Birriel; Pauline L Carvalho; Adriana Kessler; Graciele Sbruzzi
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the control of pain during rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Barbara A Rakel; M Bridget Zimmerman; Katharine Geasland; Jennie Embree; Charles R Clark; Nicolas O Noiseux; John J Callaghan; Keela Herr; Deirdre Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 6.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Tracey E Howe; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-15

7.  Immediate effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) administered during resistance exercise on pain intensity and physical performance of healthy subjects: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mayara A Menezes; Thaís A B Pereira; Leonardo M Tavares; Belissa T Q Leite; Antônio G R Neto; Leury M S Chaves; Lucas V Lima; Marzo E Da Silva-Grigolleto; Josimari M DeSantana
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, pain sensitivity, and function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carol Grace T Vance; Barbara A Rakel; Nicole P Blodgett; Josimari Melo DeSantana; Annunziato Amendola; Miriam Bridget Zimmerman; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30

9.  Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, function, and quality of life in fibromyalgia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Brian Noehren; Dana L Dailey; Barbara A Rakel; Carol G T Vance; Miriam B Zimmerman; Leslie J Crofford; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-09-11

Review 10.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Leica S Claydon; G Peter Herbison; Gareth Jones; Carole A Paley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.