Literature DB >> 686873

Studies with pain rating scales.

W W Downie, P A Leatham, V M Rhind, V Wright, J A Branco, J A Anderson.   

Abstract

Good correlation has been shown between pain scores derived from 4 different rating scales. The correlation was maintained when presentation of the scales was separated by a series of questions and by physical examination. There is good evidence that the 4 scales are measuring the same underlying pain variable as they calibrate well. There is also evidence that an 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale performs better than both a 4-point simple descriptive scale or a continuous (visual analogue) scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 686873      PMCID: PMC1000250          DOI: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  3 in total

1.  Graphic representation of pain.

Authors:  J Scott; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D M Ritchie; J A Boyle; J M McInnes; M K Jasani; T G Dalakos; P Grieveson; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1968-07

3.  Statistical approach to indices of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  R J McGuire; V Wright
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 19.103

  3 in total
  351 in total

1.  Comparison of parenteral treatments of acute primary headache in a large academic emergency department cohort.

Authors:  Lucas H McCarthy; Robert P Cowan
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.292

2.  Severe pain confounds neuropsychological test performance.

Authors:  E J Heyer; R Sharma; C J Winfree; J Mocco; D J McMahon; P A McCormick; D O Quest; J G McMurtry; C J Riedel; R M Lazar; Y Stern; E S Connolly
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  [Differences between anteroposterior and posterior spondylodesis in clinical scores].

Authors:  O Linhardt; A Krüger; A Krödel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  The effects of rehabilitation on the muscles of the trunk following prolonged bed rest.

Authors:  Julie A Hides; Gunda Lambrecht; Carolyn A Richardson; Warren R Stanton; Gabriele Armbrecht; Casey Pruett; Volker Damann; Dieter Felsenberg; Daniel L Belavý
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Physical Activity and Lymphedema (the PAL trial): assessing the safety of progressive strength training in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz; Andrea B Troxel; Andrea Cheville; Lorita L Grant; Cathy J Bryan; Cynthia R Gross; Leslie A Lytle; Rehana L Ahmed
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Low-level laser therapy in meniscal pathology: a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Nikolaos Malliaropoulos; Olga Kiritsi; Kostantinos Tsitas; Dimitris Christodoulou; A Akritidou; Angelo Del Buono; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Association of G472A allele of membrane bound catechol-O-methyltransferase gene with chronic post-sternotomy pain.

Authors:  Goduguchintha Dharaniprasad; Aloka Samantaray; Mangu Hanumantha Rao; Abha Chandra; Potukuchi Venkata Gurunadha Krishna Sarma
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08-02

8.  The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement.

Authors:  G B Langley; H Sheppeard
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Naproxen sodium, diflunisal, and placebo in the treatment of chronic back pain.

Authors:  H Berry; B Bloom; E B Hamilton; D R Swinson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Comparison of a traditional paracetamol medication and a new paracetamol/paracetamol-methionine ester combination.

Authors:  L A Skoglund; P Skjelbred
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.