Literature DB >> 7120145

Accurate repositioning of the human thumb against unpredictable dynamic loads is dependent upon peripheral feed-back.

B L Day, C D Marsden.   

Abstract

1. The strategy of accurate movement of the human thumb has been studied in nine subjects. An open-loop hypothesis, which states that a new final position is defined by re-setting the agonist/antagonist spring constants, was tested2. Subjects were trained to flex the top joint of the thumb rapidly through 20 deg in about a third of a second from a fixed starting position against a load. Occasionally, and unpredictably, the viscous friction of the load was altered prior to it's being moved. The spring hypothesis predicts that such a change in load should have no effect on final position accuracy.3. Under normal conditions no final position error developed when the viscous friction was increased. A small overshoot occurred when the viscous friction was decreased.4. The electromyogram recorded from surface electrodes over the belly of flexor pollicis longus in the forearm revealed an increase in activity in response to an increase in viscous friction and a decrease in activity when the viscous friction was reduced.5. When the joint and cutaneous afferents from the thumb were anaesthetized, the e.m.g. response to a change in viscous friction was severely attenuated and consistent final position errors developed.6. Even though the compensatory open-loop muscle properties went some way towards maintaining accuracy, the change in final position error that occurred as a result of thumb anaesthesia correlated well (r = 0.84) with the amount of muscle e.m.g. response that was lost.7. The latency of the e.m.g. response to a change in viscous friction was compared to that of a voluntary response by asking the subject to push down or let go upon perception of the load change. Approximately the first 100 ms of the e.m.g. response was unaffected by the voluntary intervention of the subject.8. We conclude that the spring hypothesis does not explain human thumb movement. It is argued that the long-latency stretch reflex machinery is responsible for some automatic compensation for unexpected interference with movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7120145      PMCID: PMC1225115          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  11 in total

1.  MODIFICATIONS OF NEURAL OUTPUT SIGNALS BY MUSCLES: A FREQUENCY RESPONSE STUDY.

Authors:  L D PARTRIDGE
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Intrinsic feedback factors producing inertial compensation in muscle.

Authors:  L D Partridge
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The relation between force and velocity in human muscle.

Authors:  D R WILKIE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Servo action in human voluntary movement.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-07-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Effect of thumb anaesthesia on weight perception, muscle activity and the stretch reflex in man.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J C Rothwell; M M Traub
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The sensory mechanism of servo action in human muscle.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position.

Authors:  E Bizzi; A Polit; P Morasso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production.

Authors:  J A Kelso; K G Holt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscle.

Authors:  L D Partridge
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1966-05

10.  Servo action in the human thumb.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  11 in total

1.  The neural control of single degree-of-freedom elbow movements. Effect of starting joint position.

Authors:  Janey Prodoehl; Gerald L Gottlieb; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets.

Authors:  C Minos Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human basal ganglia and the dynamic control of force during on-line corrections.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Chuanxin M Niu; Cynthia Poon; Fabian J David; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adjustments of fast goal-directed movements in response to an unexpected inertial load.

Authors:  J B Smeets; C J Erkelens; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: evidence for amplitude rather than position control.

Authors:  O Bock; R Eckmiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of different types of mechanical load on the duration of the initial agonist pulse.

Authors:  R W Simmons; C Richardson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Independent control of initial kinematics and terminal oscillations of rapid positioning movements.

Authors:  C B Walter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Rapid goal-directed elbow flexion movements: limitations of the speed control system due to neural constraints.

Authors:  R Benecke; H M Meinck; B Conrad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans.

Authors:  G Westling; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.