Literature DB >> 22071685

Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets.

C Minos Niu1, Daniel M Corcos, Mark B Shapiro.   

Abstract

Simple movements can be seen as building blocks for complex action sequences, and neural control of an action sequence can be expected to preserve some control features of its constituent blocks. It was previously found that during single-joint elbow movements to a single target, the proprioceptive feedback control is initially suppressed, and we tested this feedback suppression in a two-segment sequence during which subjects momentarily slowed down at an intermediate target at a 30° distance (first segment) and then immediately moved another 30° to the final target (second segment). Either the first or second segment was unexpectedly perturbed; the latency of the earliest response to the perturbation in the muscle surface electromyogram was analyzed. The perturbations were delivered either at the onset of each segment or about 0.1 s later. We found that in both segments, the response latency to the late perturbation was shorter than the latency to the early perturbation, which suggests that the proprioceptive feedback control is suppressed in the beginning of each segment. Next, we determined the latency of the response to unexpected perturbations in 30° movements to a single target. We found that the response latency was not significantly different in the movement to a single target and in each segment in the sequence. This result suggests that the initial suppression of the proprioceptive feedback control in movements to single targets is preserved in movements through intermediate targets and supports the idea of modular organization of neural control of movement sequences.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071685     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2928-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

1.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

2.  EMG responses to an unexpected load in fast movements are delayed with an increase in the expected movement time.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Gerald L Gottlieb; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Donald J Crammond; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal shift from velocity to position proprioceptive feedback control during reaching movements.

Authors:  C Minos Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Chuanxin M Niu; Cynthia Poon; Fabian J David; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Modulation of presynaptic inhibition of la afferents during voluntary wrist flexion and extension in man.

Authors:  C Aymard; M Baret; R Katz; C Lafitte; A Pénicaud; S Raoul
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Role for supplementary motor area cells in planning several movements ahead.

Authors:  J Tanji; K Shima
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-09-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  There and back again: putting the vectorial movement planning hypothesis to a critical test.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Kobak; Simone Cardoso de Oliveira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.