Literature DB >> 3582527

Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans.

G Westling, R S Johansson.   

Abstract

Impulses in single tactile units innervating the human glabrous skin were recorded percutaneously from the median nerve using tungsten electrodes. The units were classified as belonging to one of the four categories: fast adapting with small receptive fields (FA I), fast adapting with large receptive fields (FA II), slowly adapting with small fields (SA I), and slowly adapting with large fields (SA II). A small test object was lifted, positioned in space and replaced using the precision grip between fingers and thumb. The grip force, the load force (vertical lifting force), the vertical movements of the object and vibrations (accelerations) in the object were recorded. After being virtually silent between lifts, the FA I units whose fields contacted the object became highly active during the initial period of grip force increase (initial response). This was also true for most SA I units. Accordingly, most of the skin deformation changes took place at low grip forces (below ca. 1 N). Later, while the load and grip forces increased in parallel during isometric conditions, the FA I and SA I units continued firing but generally at declining impulse rates. As long as the object was held in the air, the SA I units generally maintained firing with a tendency to adaptation. A minority of the FA I unit also discharged, especially during periods of pronounced physiological muscle tremor. The SA I units usually became silent when the grip and load forces in parallel declined to zero during isometric conditions after the object had contacted the table. However, during the very release of the grip the FA I units and some SA I units showed brief burst discharges (release response). The FA II units responded distinctly to the mechanical transients associated with the start of the vertical movement and especially with the sudden cessation of movement at the terminal table contact. FA II units whose end organs were remotely located in relation to the skin areas in contact with the object also responded. Most FA II units also discharged at the initial touch and at the release of the object, albeit less reliably than the type I units. In addition to weak dynamic responses during the phase of isometric force increase, the SA II units showed comparatively strong tonic responses while the object was held during static conditions. High firing rates also were maintained during long-lasting lifts. Moreover, it was established that the signals in SA II afferents were related to the three dimensional force profile in the grip.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3582527     DOI: 10.1007/bf00236209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Criticism and study of methods for examining sensibility in the hand.

Authors:  E MOBERG
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Mechanical impedance of the surface of the human body.

Authors:  E K FRANKE
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1951-04       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand.

Authors:  R S Johansson; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Cutaneous facilitation of large motor units and motor control of human fingers in precision grip.

Authors:  K Kanda; J E Desmedt
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1983

6.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; R S Johansson
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984

7.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements.

Authors:  R S Johansson; U Landström; R Lundström
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The reflex responses of single motor units in human first dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  81 in total

1.  Precision grip force control of older and younger adults, revisited.

Authors:  B D Lowe
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-12

2.  Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling; A Bäckström; J R Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Digit cooling influences grasp efficiency during manipulative tasks.

Authors:  D A Nowak; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Analysis of human postural responses to recoverable falls.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; P DiZio; E Rabin; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Abnormal capacity for grip force control in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain.

Authors:  Noritaka Kawashima; Masaki O Abe; Tsutomu Iwaya; Nobuhiko Haga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of changing skin mechanics on the differential sensitivity to surface compliance by tactile afferents in the human finger pad.

Authors:  Kathryn M Hudson; Melia Condon; Rochelle Ackerley; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson; Vaughan G Macefield; Ingvars Birznieks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Grip responses to object load perturbations are stimulus and phase sensitive.

Authors:  L A Mrotek; B A Hart; P K Schot; L Fennigkoh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Adaptations to fatigue of a single digit violate the principle of superposition in a multi-finger static prehension task.

Authors:  Tarkeshwar Singh; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.