Literature DB >> 19211001

Intrinsic feedback factors producing inertial compensation in muscle.

L D Partridge1.   

Abstract

An attempt was made to determine the factors causing the load-inertia compensation that has been observed in skeletal muscle. Cat skeletal muscle force output was determined as a function of the two variables, length and stimulus pulse rate. The results were represented in a system diagram from which it becomes apparent that: (a) the length-tension relationship in muscle forms a functional, non-neural servo feedback; (b) the force-velocity curve appears as an oscillation-damping, velocity feedback in the muscle servo; (c) the nonlinear action of pulse rate on response is, in effect, in the input element to the muscle servo system. For purpose of analysis of the motor system it appears that these signal handling characteristics of muscle make it more nearly a "position servo" than a "force motor."

Year:  2008        PMID: 19211001      PMCID: PMC1368195          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(67)86625-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  8 in total

1.  MODIFICATIONS OF NEURAL OUTPUT SIGNALS BY MUSCLES: A FREQUENCY RESPONSE STUDY.

Authors:  L D PARTRIDGE
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Models of muscle.

Authors:  J W PRINGLE
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1960

3.  An analysis of the mechanical components in frog's striated muscle.

Authors:  B R JEWELL; D R WILKIE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1958-10-31       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  [Relation between strength and speed of extension and contraction of striated muscle].

Authors:  X AUBERT
Journal:  Arch Int Physiol Biochim       Date:  1956-01

5.  The mechanism of the myogenic rhythm of certain insect striated muscles.

Authors:  J W PRINGLE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-05-28       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The relation between velocity of shortening and the tension-length curve of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  B C ABBOTT; D R WILKIE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1953-04-28       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Muscular force at different speeds of shortening.

Authors:  W O Fenn; B S Marsh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1935-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscle.

Authors:  L D Partridge
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1966-05
  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Predictions and experimental tests of a visco-elastic muscle model using elastic and inertial loads.

Authors:  P Bawa; A Mannard; R B Stein
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Sensory control of normal movement and of movement aided by neural prostheses.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements.

Authors:  F Lestienne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-05-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A simplified sliding-filament muscle model for simulation purposes.

Authors:  S Dijkstra; J J van der Gon; T Blangé; J M Karemaker; A E Kramer
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1973-02

5.  Fast aiming movements with the left and right arm: evidence for two-process theories of motor control.

Authors:  H Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1981

6.  Accurate repositioning of the human thumb against unpredictable dynamic loads is dependent upon peripheral feed-back.

Authors:  B L Day; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Simulation of human arm movements controlled by peripheral feedback.

Authors:  J H van Dijk
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1978-05-31       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Skeletal muscle contraction. The thorough definition of the contractile event requires both load acceleration and load mass to be known.

Authors:  Enrico Grazi; Sara Pozzati
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.432

9.  EMG responses to unexpected perturbations are delayed in slower movements.

Authors:  Fabian J David; Cynthia Poon; Chuanxin M Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.