Literature DB >> 7108035

Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique.

P M Sellick, R Patuzzi, B M Johnstone.   

Abstract

Basilar membrane motion was measured at the 16-19 kHz place of the guinea pig cochlea using the Mössbauer technique. The threshold of the gross cochlear action potential (CAP) evoked by pure-tone bursts was used as an indication of neural threshold. CAP threshold deteriorated progressively after the cochlea was opened and the Mössbauer source placed on the basilar membrane. A close relationship was found between the amplitude of basilar membrane motion at the source place frequency and CAP threshold. Basilar membrane velocity at CAP threshold SPL was about 0.04 mm/s over a 60-dB range of CAP threshold. Intensity functions for basilar membrane motion were linear for frequencies more than an octave below the source place frequency but demonstrated progressive saturation for frequencies greater than an octave below the CF. This nonlinear behavior was eliminated as the CAP threshold became less sensitive and was absent post mortem. Isovelocity curves at the 0.04 mm/s criterion were remarkably similar to frequency threshold curves from primary afferent fibers innervating a similar place on the basilar membrane. The isovelocity curve was a better fit than the isoamplitude curve suggesting that inner hair cells respond to basilar membrane velocity. As the CAP threshold deteriorated, the isovelocit curves lost sensitivity around the best frequency, whereas sensitivity to frequencies below 10 kHz remained constant even after the animal was killed. We suggested that most of the frequency response and nonlinear behavior of inner hair cells and afferent fibers may be found in basilar motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7108035     DOI: 10.1121/1.387996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  101 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Comparing in vitro, in situ, and in vivo experimental data in a three-dimensional model of mammalian cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  P J Kolston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The spatial and temporal representation of a tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

Authors:  K E Nilsen; I J Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint.

Authors:  G A Manley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing.

Authors:  F Jülicher; D Andor; T Duke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Patch clamped responses from outer hair cells in the intact adult organ of Corti.

Authors:  F Mammano; C J Kros; J F Ashmore
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 10.  Cochlear-motor, transduction and signal-transfer tinnitus: models for three types of cochlear tinnitus.

Authors:  H P Zenner; A Ernst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.