Literature DB >> 10097096

Comparing in vitro, in situ, and in vivo experimental data in a three-dimensional model of mammalian cochlear mechanics.

P J Kolston1.   

Abstract

Normal mammalian hearing is refined by amplification of the motion of the cochlear partition. This partition, comprising the organ of Corti sandwiched between the basilar and tectorial membranes, contains the outer hair cells that are thought to drive this amplification process. Force generation by outer hair cells has been studied extensively in vitro and in situ, but, to understand cochlear amplification fully, it is necessary to characterize the role played by each of the components of the cochlear partition in vivo. Observations of cochlear partition motion in vivo are severely restricted by its inaccessibility and sensitivity to surgical trauma, so, for the present study, a computer model has been used to simulate the operation of the cochlea under different experimental conditions. In this model, which uniquely retains much of the three-dimensional complexity of the real cochlea, the motions of the basilar and tectorial membranes are fundamentally different during in situ- and in vivo-like conditions. Furthermore, enhanced outer hair cell force generation in vitro leads paradoxically to a decrease in the gain of the cochlear amplifier during sound stimulation to the model in vivo. These results suggest that it is not possible to extrapolate directly from experimental observations made in vitro and in situ to the normal operation of the intact organ in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10097096      PMCID: PMC22353          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Mechanics of microtubule bundles in pillar cells from the inner ear.

Authors:  J A Tolomeo; M C Holley
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Tectorial membrane. II: Stiffness measurements in vivo.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; L K Cefaratti
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  J F Ashmore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  W E Brownell; C R Bader; D Bertrand; Y de Ribaupierre
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  An active process in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea.

Authors:  S M Khanna; D G Leonard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  P M Sellick; R Patuzzi; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stiffness of sensory-cell hair bundles in the isolated guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  D Strelioff; A Flock
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  13 in total

1.  The spatial and temporal representation of a tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

Authors:  K E Nilsen; I J Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Impedance analysis of the organ of corti with magnetically actuated probes.

Authors:  Marc P Scherer; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Force transmission in the organ of Corti micromachine.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Vibration pattern of the organ of Corti up to 50 kHz: evidence for resonant electromechanical force.

Authors:  Marc P Scherer; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Electromechanical models of the outer hair cell composite membrane.

Authors:  A A Spector; N Deo; K Grosh; J T Ratnanather; R M Raphael
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  High-frequency force generation in the constrained cochlear outer hair cell: a model study.

Authors:  Zhijie Liao; Aleksander S Popel; William E Brownell; Alexander A Spector
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

Review 9.  Instrumentation for studies of cochlear mechanics: from von Békésy forward.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Modelling cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Guangjian Ni; Stephen J Elliott; Mohammad Ayat; Paul D Teal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.