Literature DB >> 11050205

The spatial and temporal representation of a tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

K E Nilsen1, I J Russell.   

Abstract

In the mammalian cochlea, the basilar membrane's (BM) mechanical responses are amplified, and frequency tuning is sharpened through active feedback from the electromotile outer hair cells (OHCs). To be effective, OHC feedback must be delivered to the correct region of the BM and introduced at the appropriate time in each cycle of BM displacement. To investigate when OHCs contribute to cochlear amplification, a laser-diode interferometer was used to measure tone-evoked BM displacements in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. Measurements were made at multiple sites across the width of the BM, which are tuned to the same characteristic frequency (CF). In response to CF tones, the largest displacements occur in the OHC region and phase lead those measured beneath the outer pillar cells and adjacent to the spiral ligament by about 90 degrees. Postmortem, responses beneath the OHCs are reduced by up to 65 dB, and all regions across the width of the BM move in unison. We suggest that OHCs amplify BM responses to CF tones when the BM is moving at maximum velocity. In regions of the BM where OHCs contribute to its motion, the responses are compressive and nonlinear. We measured the distribution of nonlinear compressive vibrations along the length of the BM in response to a single frequency tone and estimated that OHC amplification is restricted to a 1.25- to 1.40-mm length of BM centered on the CF place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050205      PMCID: PMC34345          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparing in vitro, in situ, and in vivo experimental data in a three-dimensional model of mammalian cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  P J Kolston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cochlear nerve fiber responses: distribution along the cochlear partition.

Authors:  R R Pfeiffer; D O Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Laser Doppler velocimetry of basilar membrane vibration.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; D F Dolan; G Avinash
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Mechanics of microtubule bundles in pillar cells from the inner ear.

Authors:  J A Tolomeo; M C Holley
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces.

Authors:  C D Geisler; C Sang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  No sharpening? a challenge for cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  E de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Patch clamped responses from outer hair cells in the intact adult organ of Corti.

Authors:  F Mammano; C J Kros; J F Ashmore
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.657

View more
  14 in total

1.  Comparison of a hair bundle's spontaneous oscillations with its response to mechanical stimulation reveals the underlying active process.

Authors:  P Martin; A J Hudspeth; F Jülicher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Force transmission in the organ of Corti micromachine.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Cochlear partition anatomy and motion in humans differ from the classic view of mammals.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; John J Guinan; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Instrumentation for studies of cochlear mechanics: from von Békésy forward.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; David Kemp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Anping Xia; Jinkyung Kim; Nicolas Grillet; Brian E Applegate; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Finite-element model of the active organ of Corti.

Authors:  Guangjian Ni; Stephen J Elliott; Johannes Baumgart
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  The spatial pattern of cochlear amplification.

Authors:  Jonathan A N Fisher; Fumiaki Nin; Tobias Reichenbach; Revathy C Uthaiah; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.