Literature DB >> 11050203

Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint.

G A Manley1.   

Abstract

The hearing organ of the inner ear was the last of the paired sense organs of amniotes to undergo formative evolution. As a mechanical sensory organ, the inner-ear hearing organ's function depends highly on its physical structure. Comparative studies suggest that the hearing organ of the earliest amniote vertebrates was small and simple, but possessed hair cells with a cochlear amplifier mechanism, electrical frequency tuning, and incipient micromechanical tuning. The separation of the different groups of amniotes from the stem reptiles occurred relatively early, with the ancestors of the mammals branching off first, approximately 320 million years ago. The evolution of the hearing organ in the three major lines of the descendents of the stem reptiles (e.g., mammals, birds-crocodiles, and lizards-snakes) thus occurred independently over long periods of time. Dramatic and parallel improvements in the middle ear initiated papillar elongation in all lineages, accompanied by increased numbers of sensory cells with enhanced micromechanical tuning and group-specific hair-cell specializations that resulted in unique morphological configurations. This review aims not only to compare structure and function across classification boundaries (the comparative approach), but also to assess how and to what extent fundamental mechanisms were influenced by selection pressures in times past (the phylogenetic viewpoint).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050203      PMCID: PMC34343          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  Spontaneous and electrically induced movements of ampullary kinocilia and stereovilli.

Authors:  A Rüsch; U Thurm
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range.

Authors:  G K Yates; I M Winter; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory primary afferents in the starling: correlation of function and morphology.

Authors:  O Gleich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  A W Gummer; J W Smolders; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory receptor of the red-eared turtle: I. General ultrastructure.

Authors:  M G Sneary
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-10-22       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Reversed tonotopic map of the basilar papilla in Gekko gecko.

Authors:  G A Manley; C Köppl; M Sneary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties.

Authors:  M C Liberman; M E Oliver
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-02-20       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Auditory structure and function in the bird middle ear: an evaluation by SEM and capacitive probe.

Authors:  J C Saunders
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  An active process in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  A C Crawford; R Fettiplace
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  70 in total

1.  In vivo evidence for a cochlear amplifier in the hair-cell bundle of lizards.

Authors:  G A Manley; D L Kirk; C Köppl; G K Yates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Putting ion channels to work: mechanoelectrical transduction, adaptation, and amplification by hair cells.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; Y Choe; A D Mehta; P Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  P Martin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparison of a hair bundle's spontaneous oscillations with its response to mechanical stimulation reveals the underlying active process.

Authors:  P Martin; A J Hudspeth; F Jülicher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase isoform 2a is the PMCA of hair bundles.

Authors:  R A Dumont; U Lins; A G Filoteo; J T Penniston; B Kachar; P G Gillespie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Hair-bundle movements elicited by transepithelial electrical stimulation of hair cells in the sacculus of the bullfrog.

Authors:  D Bozovic; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Identification and localization of an arachidonic acid-sensitive potassium channel in the cochlea.

Authors:  Bernd H A Sokolowski; Yoshihisa Sakai; Margaret C Harvey; Dmytro E Duzhyy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Spatial tuning curves along the chick basilar papilla in normal and sound-exposed ears.

Authors:  J Lifshitz; A C Furman; K W Altman; J C Saunders
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-06

9.  Sound-induced motions of individual cochlear hair bundles.

Authors:  A J Aranyosi; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Concise review: Inner ear stem cells--an oxymoron, but why?

Authors:  Mohammad Ronaghi; Marjan Nasr; Stefan Heller
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.