Literature DB >> 17251105

Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution.

Gareth Jones1, Marc W Holderied.   

Abstract

Bat echolocation calls provide remarkable examples of 'good design' through evolution by natural selection. Theory developed from acoustics and sonar engineering permits a strong predictive basis for understanding echolocation performance. Call features, such as frequency, bandwidth, duration and pulse interval are all related to ecological niche. Recent technological breakthroughs have aided our understanding of adaptive aspects of call design in free-living bats. Stereo videogrammetry, laser scanning of habitat features and acoustic flight path tracking permit reconstruction of the flight paths of echolocating bats relative to obstacles and prey in nature. These methods show that echolocation calls are among the most intense airborne vocalizations produced by animals. Acoustic tracking has clarified how and why bats vary call structure in relation to flight speed. Bats using broadband echolocation calls adjust call design in a range-dependent manner so that nearby obstacles are localized accurately. Recent phylogenetic analyses based on gene sequences show that particular types of echolocation signals have evolved independently in several lineages of bats. Call design is often influenced more by perceptual challenges imposed by the environment than by phylogeny, and provides excellent examples of convergent evolution. Now that whole genome sequences of bats are imminent, understanding the functional genomics of echolocation will become a major challenge.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251105      PMCID: PMC1919403          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats.

Authors:  R Arlettaz; G Jones; P A Racey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.

Authors:  M S Springer; E C Teeling; O Madsen; M J Stanhope; W W de Jong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats.

Authors:  M W Holderied; O von Helversen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  No cost of echolocation for bats in flight.

Authors:  J R Speakman; P A Racey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record.

Authors:  Emma C Teeling; Mark S Springer; Ole Madsen; Paul Bates; Stephen J O'brien; William J Murphy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A nuclear DNA phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of echolocation and historical biogeography of extant bats (chiroptera).

Authors:  Geeta N Eick; David S Jacobs; Conrad A Matthee
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Neural attenuation of responses to emitted sounds in echolocating rats.

Authors:  N Suga; P Schlegel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Peripheral control of acoustic signals in the auditory system of echolocating bats.

Authors:  N Suga; P H Jen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  46 in total

1.  Graphene electrostatic microphone and ultrasonic radio.

Authors:  Qin Zhou; Jinglin Zheng; Seita Onishi; M F Crommie; Alex K Zettl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The predictability of evolution: glimpses into a post-Darwinian world.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-09-23

Review 4.  From optics to attention: visual perception in barn owls.

Authors:  Wolf M Harmening; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Nickolay I Hristov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats.

Authors:  Noam Cvikel; Eran Levin; Edward Hurme; Ivailo Borissov; Arjan Boonman; Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Touchdown to take-off: at the interface of flight and surface locomotion.

Authors:  William R T Roderick; Mark R Cutkosky; David Lentink
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Development of echolocation calls and neural selectivity for echolocation calls in the pallid bat.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.964

9.  Inconspicuous echolocation in hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus).

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Theodore J Weller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Parallel and convergent evolution of the dim-light vision gene RH1 in bats (Order: Chiroptera).

Authors:  Yong-Yi Shen; Jie Liu; David M Irwin; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.