Literature DB >> 7040462

Use of the automicrobic and enteric-tek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

J Goldstein, J J Guarneri, P Della-Latta, J Scherer.   

Abstract

Studies were performed to evaluate the use of the Enteric-Tek (ET) and the AutoMicrobic system (AMS) for the identification of 201 Enterobacteriaceae freshly isolated from clinical specimens. All test systems were inoculated simultaneously from the same MacConkey agar plate. Organisms were also identified with conventional media. Identifications with the ET and AMS agreed with those made with conventional biochemicals 97% of the time. At a 95% confidence level, the ET was able to identify 75% of the isolates within 18 h without the aid of additional biochemical tests; the AMS identified 92% in 8 h. Technologist time needed for identifications made with the AMS was reduced approximately 57% compared with the ET. In all instances in which the AMS identification disagreed with the conventional, the ET identified the organism correctly. Similarly, organisms misidentified by the ET were correctly identified by the AMS. The data suggest that the AMS and ET identify clinical isolates with comparable accuracy; however, the AMS offers a significant savings in time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7040462      PMCID: PMC272162          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.654-659.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of automated microbial detection/identification system in analysis of clinical urine specimens.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; T L Gavan; A Sonnenwirth; W I Taylor; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparative study of three methods of identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  I Rutherford; V Moody; T L Gavan; L W Ayers; D L Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the further improved Enterotube and Encise II.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; J S Scherber; J O Cosgrove
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours.

Authors:  M J Ferraro; M A Edelblut; L J Kunz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; T L Gavan; P B Smith; A Sonnenwirth; W Taylor; W J Martin; D Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multi-laboratory evaluation of an automated microbial detection/identification system.

Authors:  P B Smith; T L Gavan; H D Isenberg; A Sonnenwirth; W I Taylor; J A Washington; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Preprototype of an automated microbial detection and identification system: a developmental investigation.

Authors:  A C Sonnenwirth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Automated microbiological detection/identification system.

Authors:  C Aldridge; P W Jones; S Gibson; J Lanham; M Meyer; R Vannest; R Charles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Auto-Microbic system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  J J Hasyn; K R Cundy; C C Dietz; W Wong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Evaluation of the updated MS-2 Bacterial Identification system in comparison with the API 20E system.

Authors:  J R DiPersio; J W Dyke; R D Vannest
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the automicrobic system for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; M N Ederer; C O Quall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the automicrobic system for detection of resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; M N Ederer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C B Castillo; D A Bruckner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.