Literature DB >> 7015141

Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast.

U Veronesi, R Saccozzi, M Del Vecchio, A Banfi, C Clemente, M De Lena, G Gallus, M Greco, A Luini, E Marubini, G Muscolino, F Rilke, B Salvadori, A Zecchini, R Zucali.   

Abstract

From 1973 to 1980, we carried out a controlled study at the National Cancer Institute in Milan to consider the value of a conservative procedure in patients with breast cancer of small size. We randomized 701 patients with breast cancer measuring less than 2 cm in diameter and with no palpable axillary lymph nodes to Halsted radical mastectomy or to "quadrantectomy" with axillary dissection and radiotherapy to the ipsilateral residual breast tissue. We treated 349 patients with Halsted mastectomy and 352 with quadrantectomy. The two groups were comparable in age distribution, size and site of primary tumor, menopausal status, and frequency of axillary metastases. There were three local recurrences in the Halsted group and one in the quadrantectomy group. Actuarial curves showed no difference between the two groups in disease-free or overall survival. From these results, mastectomy appears to involve unnecessary mutilation in patients with breast cancer of less than 2 cm and no palpable axillary nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7015141     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198107023050102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  207 in total

1.  Recent Progress in Breast Conserving Therapy: From Experiences in Japan.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Management of breast cancer: what do I tell the patient?

Authors:  C J Wright
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Local Recurrence after Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1996-06-28       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  Controversies in the Surgical Management of Operable Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1994-12-30       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 5.  Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.

Authors:  A L Siu; E A McGlynn; H Morgenstern; M H Beers; D M Carlisle; E B Keeler; J Beloff; K Curtin; J Leaning; B C Perry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Piercarlo Rey; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Stefano Martella; Andrea Manconi; Benedetta Barbieri; Krishna B Clough
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Natasha M Rueth; Andrea Abbott; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Current status and indications for adjuvant therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Senn
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Trends in breast-conserving surgery in Denmark, 1982-2002.

Authors:  Thomas P Ahern; Heidi Larsson; Jens Peter Garne; Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.