Literature DB >> 1464537

Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.

A L Siu1, E A McGlynn, H Morgenstern, M H Beers, D M Carlisle, E B Keeler, J Beloff, K Curtin, J Leaning, B C Perry.   

Abstract

Consumers, payers, and policymakers are demanding to know more about the quality of the services they are purchasing or might purchase. The information provided, however, is often driven by data availability rather than by epidemiologic and clinical considerations. In this article, we present an approach for selecting topics for measuring technical quality of care, based on the expected impact on health of improved quality. This approach employs data or estimates on disease burden, efficacy of available treatments, and the current quality of care being provided. We use this model to select measures that could be used to measure the quality of care in health plans, but the proposed framework could also be used to select quality of care measures for other purposes or in other contexts (for example, to select measures for hospitals). Given the limited resources available for quality assessment and the policy consequences of better information on provider quality, priorities for assessment efforts should focus on those areas where better quality translates into improved health.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1464537      PMCID: PMC1069903     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  65 in total

1.  Trial of tissue plasminogen activator for mortality reduction in acute myocardial infarction. Anglo-Scandinavian Study of Early Thrombolysis (ASSET).

Authors:  R G Wilcox; G von der Lippe; C G Olsson; G Jensen; A M Skene; J R Hampton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk node-negative breast cancer. An intergroup study.

Authors:  E G Mansour; R Gray; A H Shatila; C K Osborne; D C Tormey; K W Gilchrist; M R Cooper; G Falkson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Coronary heart disease is not preventable by population interventions.

Authors:  J McCormick; P Skrabanek
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in heart disease. I. Treatments following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Yusuf; J Wittes; L Friedman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Adoption of thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M A Hlatky; H Cotugno; C O'Connor; D B Mark; D B Pryor; R M Califf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina.

Authors:  P Théroux; H Ouimet; J McCans; J G Latour; P Joly; G Lévy; E Pelletier; M Juneau; J Stasiak; P deGuise
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Benefits and potential harm of lowering high blood pressure.

Authors:  J M Cruickshank; J M Thorp; F J Zacharias
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Improving the utilization of screening mammography in primary care practices.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; R J Panzer; J Janus
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-09

9.  Surgical adjuvant therapy of large-bowel carcinoma: an evaluation of levamisole and the combination of levamisole and fluorouracil. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  J A Laurie; C G Moertel; T R Fleming; H S Wieand; J E Leigh; J Rubin; G W McCormack; J B Gerstner; J E Krook; J Malliard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

2.  Health-related quality of life: an indicator of quality of care?

Authors:  H F Treurniet; M L Essink-Bot; J P Mackenbach; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quantifying the expected vs potential impact of a risk-factor intervention program.

Authors:  M Bulterys; H Morgenstern; D L Weed
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  From exposures to population interventions: pregnancy and response to HIV therapy.

Authors:  Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The UK pay-for-performance programme in primary care: estimation of population mortality reduction.

Authors:  Robert Fleetcroft; Sheetal Parekh-Bhurke; Amanda Howe; Richard Cookson; Louise Swift; Nicholas Steel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Improving the quality of healthcare for children: implementing the results of the AHSR research agenda conference.

Authors:  N Halfon; M Schuster; W Valentine; E McGlynn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The Public Health Impact score: a new measure of public health effectiveness for general practices in England.

Authors:  Mark Ashworth; Peter Schofield; Tim Doran; Richard Cookson; Matthew Sutton; Paul T Seed; Amanda Howe; Robert Fleetcroft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Robert Fleetcroft; Nicholas Steel; Richard Cookson; Simon Walker; Amanda Howe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Measuring the Quality of Care in Different Settings.

Authors:  Elizabeth Docteur
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001

10.  A quality improvement project to improve the Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sepsis bundle compliance rate in a large healthcare system.

Authors:  Robert A Raschke; Robert H Groves; Hargobind S Khurana; Nidhi Nikhanj; Ethel Utter; Didi Hartling; Brenda Stoffer; Kristina Nunn; Shona Tryon; Michelle Bruner; Maria Calleja; Steven C Curry
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2017-10-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.