Literature DB >> 6982909

Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 6. effect of nonuniform resolution.

E J Hoffman, S C Huang, D Plummer, M E Phelps.   

Abstract

The intrinsic resolution (FWHM) of coincident bismuth germanate detector pairs was measured for geometries consistent with positron emission computed tomography systems designed for brain imaging. The resolutions were measured as a function of the position in the field of view (FOV) for single slice and multislice configurations for both the image and axial resolutions. System diameters of 66 to 42 cm were simulated, and intrinsic resolution variation for image and axial dimensions for a 24 cm FOV were 14 and 32% and 24 and 39%, respectively. Measurement of axial resolutions of interplane slices of multiplane systems employing interplane septa showed resolution variations for the 24 cm FOV of as large as a factor of three. A simple model was shown to predict the dominant features of the line shapes. Images of phantoms with small axial dimensions indicate that the variations in resolution, particularly in interplane data, seriously compromise the validity of point to point comparison of information within an image or between single plane and interplane images. Serious variations in axial resolution were shown to create artifacts and degrade the image resolution. Index Terms: Emission computed tomography--Image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6982909     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198210000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  16 in total

Review 1.  3D acquisition and reconstruction in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Bailey
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 2.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Virtual-pinhole PET.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Heyu Wu; Debashish Pal; Joseph A O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Terry Jones; David Townsend
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-31

5.  Assessment of a three-dimensional line-of-response probability density function system matrix for PET.

Authors:  Rutao Yao; Ranjith M Ramachandra; Neeraj Mahajan; Vinay Rathod; Noel Gunasekar; Ashish Panse; Tianyu Ma; Yiqiang Jian; Jianhua Yan; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  On estimating the loss of quantification in PET due to finite detector resolution.

Authors:  A N Bice; D F Wong; H N Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1987

7.  PET imaging for the quantification of biologically heterogeneous tumours: measuring the effect of relative position on image-based quantification of dose-painting targets.

Authors:  Keisha C McCall; David L Barbee; Michael W Kissick; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Reduced serotonin receptors and transporters in normal aging adults: a meta-analysis of PET and SPECT imaging studies.

Authors:  Teresa M Karrer; Casey L McLaughlin; Carmela P Guaglianone; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 9.  What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Luc Bidaut; John Dickson; Marc Kachelriess; Fabian Kiessling; Rainer Leitgeb; Jingfei Ma; Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar; Benjamin Theek; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Limits of Tumor Detectability in Nuclear Medicine and PET.

Authors:  Yusuf Emre Erdi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2012-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.