Literature DB >> 32517801

What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology.

Thomas Beyer1, Luc Bidaut2, John Dickson3, Marc Kachelriess4, Fabian Kiessling5,6, Rainer Leitgeb7, Jingfei Ma8, Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar9, Benjamin Theek5,6, Osama Mawlawi8.   

Abstract

Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected and characterized non-invasively, so as to provide referring oncologists with essential information to support therapy management decisions. Following the onset of stand-alone anatomical and functional imaging, we witness a push towards integrating molecular image information through various methods, including anato-metabolic imaging (e.g., PET/CT), advanced MRI, optical or ultrasound imaging.This perspective paper highlights a number of key technological and methodological advances in imaging instrumentation related to anatomical, functional, molecular medicine and hybrid imaging, that is understood as the hardware-based combination of complementary anatomical and molecular imaging. These include novel detector technologies for ionizing radiation used in CT and nuclear medicine imaging, and novel system developments in MRI and optical as well as opto-acoustic imaging. We will also highlight new data processing methods for improved non-invasive tissue characterization. Following a general introduction to the role of imaging in oncology patient management we introduce imaging methods with well-defined clinical applications and potential for clinical translation. For each modality, we report first on the status quo and, then point to perceived technological and methodological advances in a subsequent status go section. Considering the breadth and dynamics of these developments, this perspective ends with a critical reflection on where the authors, with the majority of them being imaging experts with a background in physics and engineering, believe imaging methods will be in a few years from now.Overall, methodological and technological medical imaging advances are geared towards increased image contrast, the derivation of reproducible quantitative parameters, an increase in volume sensitivity and a reduction in overall examination time. To ensure full translation to the clinic, this progress in technologies and instrumentation is complemented by advances in relevant acquisition and image-processing protocols and improved data analysis. To this end, we should accept diagnostic images as "data", and - through the wider adoption of advanced analysis, including machine learning approaches and a "big data" concept - move to the next stage of non-invasive tumour phenotyping. The scans we will be reading in 10 years from now will likely be composed of highly diverse multi-dimensional data from multiple sources, which mandate the use of advanced and interactive visualization and analysis platforms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for real-time data handling by cross-specialty clinical experts with a domain knowledge that will need to go beyond that of plain imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Hybrid imaging; Instrumentation; MRI; Machine learning; Oncology imaging; Optical; SPECT; Sonography; US

Year:  2020        PMID: 32517801      PMCID: PMC7285725          DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00312-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Imaging        ISSN: 1470-7330            Impact factor:   3.909


  214 in total

1.  Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.

Authors:  S Wojcinski; A Farrokh; S Weber; A Thomas; T Fischer; T Slowinski; W Schmidt; F Degenhardt
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 6.548

Review 2.  Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Berezin; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch; Joerg Stattaus
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality.

Authors:  Wolfgang Drexler; Mengyang Liu; Abhishek Kumar; Tschackad Kamali; Angelika Unterhuber; Rainer A Leitgeb
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration.

Authors:  M E Casey; E J Hoffman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexandre Carpentier; Michael Canney; Alexandre Vignot; Vincent Reina; Kevin Beccaria; Catherine Horodyckid; Carine Karachi; Delphine Leclercq; Cyril Lafon; Jean-Yves Chapelon; Laurent Capelle; Philippe Cornu; Marc Sanson; Khê Hoang-Xuan; Jean-Yves Delattre; Ahmed Idbaih
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.

Authors:  S D Wolff; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Clinical Pilot Application of Super-Resolution US Imaging in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Stefanie Dencks; Marion Piepenbrock; Tatjana Opacic; Barbara Krauspe; Elmar Stickeler; Fabian Kiessling; Georg Schmitz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 9.  The Warburg effect: 80 years on.

Authors:  Michelle Potter; Emma Newport; Karl J Morten
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 5.407

10.  In situ structural and microangiographic assessment of human skin lesions with high-speed OCT.

Authors:  Cedric Blatter; Jessika Weingast; Aneesh Alex; Branislav Grajciar; Wolfgang Wieser; Wolfgang Drexler; Robert Huber; Rainer A Leitgeb
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cancer metabolomics: A tool of clinical utility for early diagnosis of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Akshata Kishore Karekar; Sucheta Prakash Dandekar
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.274

2.  The Release of a Highly Cytotoxic Paullone Bearing a TEMPO Free Radical from the HSA Hydrogel: An EPR Spectroscopic Characterization.

Authors:  Ana Vesković; Đura Nakarada; Olga Vasiljević; Anatolie Dobrov; Gabriella Spengler; Éva A Enyedy; Vladimir B Arion; Ana Popović Bijelić
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.