Literature DB >> 6972394

Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 4. Effect of accidental coincidences.

E J Hoffman, S C Huang, M E Phelps, D E Kuhl.   

Abstract

Accidental coincidences (ACs) and methods of compensation for ACs were investigated in terms of their effect on quantitation in positron emission computed tomography (ECT). Formulations of basic expressions describing the physical factors, which cause true coincidences or ACs, are presented to provide a framework of contrasting the two phenomena. Correction of image data for attenuation of the annihilation radiation or nonuniformities in detector efficiency is shown to amplify errors caused by the presence of ACs in the data. It was shown that failure to compensate for ACs caused overestimates in measurements of isotope concentrations from image data and that in many cases the overestimate was significant for relatively modest percentages of ACs in the data. Three methods of compensation for ACs were evaluated as to their accuracy and effect on statistical noise in images. It was found that nonuniform detector efficiencies could cause prominent image artifacts if an inadequate method was employed in the determination and subtraction of ACs from image data. The additional statistical noise produced in images by subtraction of ACs from total coincidence data demonstrates the advisability of minimizing AC rates in spite of an ability to adequately measure and compensate for their presence in the data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6972394     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198106000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  28 in total

1.  Quantitative Accuracy of HRRT List-mode Reconstructions: Effect of Low Statistics.

Authors:  Beata Planeta-Wilson; Jianhua Yan; Tim Mulnix; Richard E Carson
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2008-10-01

2.  Assessment of the short-lived non-pure positron-emitting nuclide (120)I for PET imaging.

Authors:  H Herzog; S M Qaim; L Tellmann; S Spellerberg; D Kruecker; H H Coenen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Prospects for advancing nuclear cardiology by means of new detector designs.

Authors:  Kenneth J Nichols; Andrew Van Tosh; Christopher J Palestro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Electrocardiographically gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: technical principles and quality control considerations.

Authors:  S J Cullom; J A Case; T M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Automation of gated tomographic left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  K Nichols; E G DePuey; A Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Image quantification with a large area multiwire proportional chamber positron camera (MUP-PET).

Authors:  S R Cherry; P K Marsden; R J Ott; M A Flower; S Webb; J W Babich
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

7.  Evaluation of PET count rate performance.

Authors:  B O Knoop; K Jordan; T Spinks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

Review 8.  History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Terry Jones; David Townsend
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-31

9.  On estimating the loss of quantification in PET due to finite detector resolution.

Authors:  A N Bice; D F Wong; H N Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1987

10.  Do patient data ever exceed the partial volume limit in gated SPECT studies?

Authors:  K Nichols; E G DePuey; M I Friedman; A Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.