Literature DB >> 2583197

Evaluation of PET count rate performance.

B O Knoop1, K Jordan, T Spinks.   

Abstract

A proposal is made for the test conditions to evaluate PET count rate performance. This performance depends in a complex manner on the spatial distribution of activity and scattering material. Therefore, a combined body phantom is proposed, which is as simple as possible but which adequately simulates the range of clinical application of a whole body tomograph. Taking into account the special properties of the new block detector design, a comprehensive test procedure is developed. This includes not only the common count rate characteristic, but also checks for the accuracy of randoms estimation and count loss correction schemes, and for the occurrence of pulse pile up. This is done for different source and scatter configurations, simulating brain, cardiac, and abdominal imaging, respectively. Examples are given, based on measurements of the latest generation PET scanners, namely the CT1 PT 931/08-12 and the Scanditronix PC 2048-07WB.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2583197     DOI: 10.1007/bf00631761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  7 in total

1.  A new flood phantom to measure homogeneity of gamma cameras and to correct SPECT studies.

Authors:  K Jordan; H Newiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1987

2.  Investigation of count rate and deadtime characteristics of a high resolution PET system.

Authors:  G Germano; E J Hoffman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Deadtime correction method using random coincidence for PET.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; M Amano; S Miura; H Iida; I Kanno
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Dead time correction and counting statistics for positron tomography.

Authors:  B M Mazoyer; M S Roos; R H Huesman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Cardiac nuclear medicine tomographic systems.

Authors:  K Jordan; B O Knoop
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1988

6.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 4. Effect of accidental coincidences.

Authors:  E J Hoffman; S C Huang; M E Phelps; D E Kuhl
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Performance evaluation of a positron tomograph designed for brain imaging.

Authors:  E J Hoffman; M E Phelps; S C Huang
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.057

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.