Literature DB >> 578374

Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry.

A Heijl.   

Abstract

Contrast thresholds were continuously recorded in six points of the visual field through a repetitive up-and-down staircase method using the automatic perimeter developed by Heijl & Krakau (1975b). The uninterrupted sessions lasted about 30 min. Nineteen patients with a verified diagnosis of glaucoma, or in whom glaucoma was suspected, and twelve healthy normal subjects were tested. With increasing test time, a decreased contrast sensitivity was found. In most subjects the mean threshold increment was small (less than 1.5 dB). The threshold increments were larger in the patient group than in the normal subjects--many test points showing increments of 6-10 dB during the test session. Such a large deterioration of sensitivity was most common in eyes with visual field defects. Test points which showed large threshold increments were often situated in the vicinity of documented visual field defects. In eyes with pathological visual fields, the short-term variation increased with increasing test time. An impairment of fixation with increasing test time was found in the patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 578374     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1977.tb05668.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  14 in total

1.  Baseline alterations in blue-on-yellow normal perimetric sensitivity.

Authors:  J M Wild; I D Moss
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Automatic computerized perimetry in the detection of neurological visual field defects. A pilot study.

Authors:  H Bynke; A Heijl
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04-07

3.  The interpretation of the differential threshold in the central visual field.

Authors:  J M Wild; J M Wood; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-02-28       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Variability of glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry.

Authors:  C Holmin; C E Krakau
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-06-15

5.  Evaluation of FASTPAC: a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; I D Moss; J M Wild; C Hudson; L Prokopich; D Whitaker; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Optimal test parameters for computerized quantitative layer-by-layer perimetry.

Authors:  T Bek
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl; S M Drance
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Performance of computer assisted perimeters.

Authors:  E L Greve
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.

Authors:  Alex T Pham; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Michael V Boland; Jithin Yohannan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 14.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.