Literature DB >> 17285334

Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter.

Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa1, Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez, Tinguaro Diaz Aleman, Manuel Sanchez Mendez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate a new perimetric spatial filter that takes into account relations of dependence between regions of the glaucomatous visual field.
METHODS: 51 glaucoma patients and 30 controls were examined using the Octopus 1-2-3 on four occasions using program 32; two with TOP and two with Bracketing (BRA) strategy. Each threshold was replaced by a filtered threshold, calculated as the mean of its own value and the four points best correlated with it, weighted with the correlation coefficient (r) that relates them.
RESULTS: Application of the filter had minimal effect on the absolute mean defect (MD) but reduced the square root of loss variance (sLV) by 17.6% in TOP and 28.8% in BRA, increasing the similarity between their results. Filtered TOP and BRA thresholds were more similar than those obtained in the two unfiltered BRA examinations. Filtering reduced the value of short fluctuation by 28.6% in TOP and 45.4% in BRA and reduced sLV fluctuation by 14.3% in TOP and 24.2% in BRA, thus harmonizing the two strategies for these two parameters (p > 0.05). The influence of filtering on MD fluctuation was minimal (p > 0.05). In normal subjects the number of points beyond 5 dB of normality (not reproducible false scotomas) reduced from 1.5% to 0.2% in TOP and from 4.9% to 1.6% in BRA, while in glaucoma patients changes were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed spatial filter stabilized perimetric results, acting with greater effect on BRA than on TOP, making their results more similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17285334     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-007-0538-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

1.  Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry.

Authors:  J Morales; M L Weitzman; M González de la Rosa
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Rapid assessment of the visual field in glaucoma using an analysis based on multiple correlations.

Authors:  M Gonzalez de la Rosa; J A Reyes; M A Gonzalez Sierra
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [The perimetric score in Bjerrum's area].

Authors:  J Vedy; P Queguiner; A Mouly; C Lagrange; B Rivière
Journal:  Ophtalmologie       Date:  1990 May-Jun

4.  A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; J Olsson; A Heijl; H Rootzén
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1997-08

5.  [What do glaucomatous visual fields really look like?].

Authors:  J Stürmer; B Gloor; H J Tobler
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Mae O Gordon; Julia A Beiser; James D Brandt; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; A I McNaught; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Image processing of computerised visual field data.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; D F Edgar; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; M Zulauf
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05

10.  Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; G E Trope
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Pulsar perimetry. A review and new results].

Authors:  M Gonzalez de la Rosa; M Gonzalez-Hernandez
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.