Literature DB >> 6868392

Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time.

J M Williams, A Lit.   

Abstract

The Hess effect, a monocular, latency-based illusion in which the more intensely illuminated of a pair of laterally-moving targets appears displaced ahead of the other, was studied with white targets on black background at scotopic and photopic levels. The magnitude of the Hess effect was about the same as that of the Pulfrich effect under similar photopic conditions. Reaction time declined more rapidly with increasing stimulus intensity than would have been predicted either by the Hess or the Pulfrich effect. Theoretical time-constants, computed for the Hess effect by assuming a first-order diffusion process followed by a more central non-linearity (temporal centroid), ranged between 0.145 and 0.165 sec for three observers.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6868392     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90140-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The effects of task and saliency on latencies for colour and motion processing.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A noisy transform predicts saccadic and manual reaction times to changes in contrast.

Authors:  M J Taylor; R H S Carpenter; A J Anderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Threshold units: a correct metric for reaction time?

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Influence of the Pulfrich phenomenon on driving performance.

Authors:  Armin Breyer; Xiaoyi Jiang; Adrian Rütsche; Hanspeter Bieri; Thomas Oexl; Ann Baumann; Daniel S Mojon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Christopher R L Cantor; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Rhythmic modulation of visual contrast discrimination triggered by action.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Donatella Spinelli; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Analysis of simple reaction time to a sinusoidal grating by means of a linear filter model of the detection process.

Authors:  Y Ejima; Y Ohtani
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-08

9.  Rebalancing binocular vision in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  P Jaskowski; K Rybarczyk; F Jaroszyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.