Literature DB >> 15058389

The effects of task and saliency on latencies for colour and motion processing.

Wendy J Adams1, Pascal Mamassian.   

Abstract

In human visual perception, there is evidence that different visual attributes, such as colour, form and motion, have different neural-processing latencies. Specifically, recent studies have suggested that colour changes are processed faster than motion changes. We propose that the processing latencies should not be considered as fixed quantities for different attributes, but instead depend upon attribute salience and the observer's task. We asked observers to respond to high- and low-salience colour and motion changes in three different tasks. The tasks varied from having a strong motor component to having a strong perceptual component. Increasing salience led to shorter processing times in all three tasks. We also found an interaction between task and attribute: motion was processed more quickly in reaction-time tasks, whereas colour was processed more quickly in more perceptual tasks. Our results caution against making direct comparisons between latencies for processing different visual attributes without equating salience or considering task effects. More-salient attributes are processed faster than less-salient ones, and attributes that are critical for the task are also processed more quickly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058389      PMCID: PMC1691568          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes.

Authors:  Shin'ya Nishida; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Asynchronous processing in vision: color leads motion.

Authors:  D H Arnold; C W Clifford; P Wenderoth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Vision: the when of perception.

Authors:  Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: a parallel grains model.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The time it takes to detect changes in speed and direction of visual motion.

Authors:  J Hohnsbein; S Mateeff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S M Zeki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Dynamic properties of vision. V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds.

Authors:  J A Roufs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Does colour provide an input to human motion perception?

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; R L Gregory
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Latencies for chromatic and achromatic visual mechanisms.

Authors:  R W Bowen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  3 in total

1.  Independent, synchronous access to color and motion features.

Authors:  Alex O Holcombe; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-01-18

2.  Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are inconsistent.

Authors:  Daniel Linares; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-11

3.  Asynchrony in visual consciousness and the possible involvement of attention.

Authors:  Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.