Literature DB >> 14603892

[Magnetic resonance imaging. Sequence acronyms and other abbreviations in MR imaging].

W R Nitz1.   

Abstract

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in clinical routine is still increasing. The large number of possible MR acquisition schemes reflects the variety of tissue-dependent parameters that may influence the contrast within the image. Those schemes can be categorized into gradient echo and spin echo techniques. Within these groups, further sorting can be done to differentiate between single-echo, multi-echo, and single-shot techniques. Each of these techniques can be combined with preparation schemes for modifying the longitudinal magnetization. Hybrids are found between the groups, which are those techniques that utilize spin echoes as well as gradient echoes. Academic groups as well as vendors often have different sequence acronyms for the same acquisition scheme. This contribution will sort these sequence acronyms into the previously mentioned scheme. The basic principle of the data acquisition is elaborated on and hints are given for potential clinical applications. Besides the sequence-specific acronyms, new abbreviations have surfaced recently in conjunction with parallel acquisition techniques." The latter means the utilization of multiple surface coils where the position and the sensitivity profile of the coils provide additional spatial information, allowing the application of reduced matrixes leading to a shorter measurement time.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14603892     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-0946-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  35 in total

1.  Cervical spine: three-dimensional fast spin-echo MR imaging--improved recovery of longitudinal magnetization with driven equilibrium pulse.

Authors:  E R Melhem; R Itoh; P J Folkers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI.

Authors:  R T Constable; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Cardiac first-pass and myocardial perfusion in normal subjects assessed by sub-second Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  F P van Rugge; J J Boreel; E E van der Wall; P R van Dijkman; A van der Laarse; J Doornbos; A de Roos; J A den Boer; A V Bruschke; A E van Voorthuisen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Inversion recovery snapshot FLASH MR imaging.

Authors:  A Haase; D Matthaei; R Bartkowski; E Dühmke; D Leibfritz
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Elimination of transverse coherences in FLASH MRI.

Authors:  A P Crawley; M L Wood; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero-filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR angiography.

Authors:  Y P Du; D L Parker; W L Davis; G Cao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Very fast MR imaging by field echoes and small angle excitation.

Authors:  P van der Meulen; J P Groen; J J Cuppen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.

Authors:  N M Rofsky; V S Lee; G Laub; M A Pollack; G A Krinsky; D Thomasson; M M Ambrosino; J C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Brain imaging: reduced sensitivity of RARE-derived techniques to susceptibility effects.

Authors:  P Reimer; T Allkemper; G Schuierer; P E Peters
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Modern visualization of the liver with MRT. Current trends and future perspectives].

Authors:  C J Zech; S O Schoenberg; K A Herrmann; O Dietrich; M I Menzel; T Lanz; A Wallnöfer; T Helmberger; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Comparison of 2D and 3D sequences for MRCP. Clinical value of the different techniques].

Authors:  A M Wallnoefer; K A Herrmann; U Beuers; C J Zech; S Gourtsoyianni; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Obese patients in an open MRI at 1.0 Tesla: image quality, diagnostic impact and feasibility.

Authors:  Maximilian de Bucourt; Florian Streitparth; Uta Wonneberger; Jens Rump; Ulf Teichgräber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Feasibility of 7T MRI for imaging fascicular structures of peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Daehyun Yoon; Sandip Biswal; Brian Rutt; Amelie Lutz; Brian Hargreaves
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.