Literature DB >> 3089238

Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries.

P Sujitkumar, J M Hadfield, D W Yates.   

Abstract

A retrospective survey of over 2000 patients with inversion injuries of the ankle joint was undertaken to examine the validity of criteria commonly used in an accident and emergency department to assess severity. Swelling alone is an unreliable indicator of the severity of the injury. Patients with severe pain and inability to weight bear show a high incidence of fractures and must be X-rayed. Conversely, a combination of minimal pain and swelling, and ability to bear weight are indicative of a soft-tissue injury. Young people sustain most inversion injuries and have a lower incidence of significant fractures of the lateral malleolus. Analysis of presenting features did not reveal any reliable indicants which could be used to reduce the number of radiographs requested, without substantially increasing the risk of missing patients with significant fractures. However, it has been possible to formulate guidelines for the more rational and consistent use of X-rays in the initial assessment of patients with ankle sprains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3089238      PMCID: PMC1285323          DOI: 10.1136/emj.3.2.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Emerg Med        ISSN: 0264-4924


  5 in total

1.  Why do accident and emergency doctors request X-rays?

Authors:  R A Warren; D G Ferguson
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1984-09

2.  Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  G de Lacey; S Bradbrooke
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16

3.  Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review.

Authors:  S C Brooks; B T Potter; J B Rainey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-02-21

4.  Reasons for requesting radiographs in an accident department.

Authors:  G de Lacey; A Barker; B Wignall; J Reidy; J Harper
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16

5.  The ankle injury--indications for the selective use of X-rays.

Authors:  T Vargish; W R Clarke; R A Young; A Jensen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.586

  5 in total
  17 in total

1.  Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for detecting fractures of the ankle and midfoot.

Authors:  Michelle Jenkin; Michael R Sitler; John D Kelly
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes.

Authors:  Thomas W Kaminski; Jay Hertel; Ned Amendola; Carrie L Docherty; Michael G Dolan; J Ty Hopkins; Eric Nussbaum; Wendy Poppy; Doug Richie
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Lateral and syndesmotic ankle sprain injuries: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Joshua C Dubin; Doug Comeau; Rebecca I McClelland; Rachel A Dubin; Ernest Ferrel
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-07-23

4.  Overuse of concomitant foot radiographic series in patients sustaining minor ankle injuries.

Authors:  Jonelle Petscavage; Stephen R Baker; Kim Clarkin; Lyndon Luk
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-10-16

5.  Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.

Authors:  E Papacostas; N Malliaropoulos; A Papadopoulos; C Liouliakis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  The "Shetty test" in ankle injuries: validation of a novel test to rule out ankle fractures.

Authors:  Vijay Shetty; Sandeep Wasnik; Chintan Hegde; Vishvas Shetty; Sarang Kasture; Harshad Thakur
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-08-21

7.  No impact from active dissemination of the Ottawa Ankle Rules: further evidence of the need for local implementation of practice guidelines.

Authors:  C Cameron; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

9.  Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.

Authors:  I Stiell; G Wells; A Laupacis; R Brison; R Verbeek; K Vandemheen; C D Naylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

10.  Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice.

Authors:  I G Stiell; I McDowell; R C Nair; H Aeta; G Greenberg; R D McKnight; J Ahuja
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.