Literature DB >> 20831394

Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for detecting fractures of the ankle and midfoot.

Michelle Jenkin1, Michael R Sitler, John D Kelly.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID： 20831394      PMCID： PMC2938320          DOI： 10.4085/1062-6050-45.5.480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN： 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective.

Authors:  J M Fritz; R S Wainner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  Ottawa Ankle Rules accurately asses injuries and reduce reliance on radiographs.

Authors:  Paul J Nugent
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Sprain or fracture? An analysis of 2000 ankle injuries.

Authors:  P Sujitkumar; J M Hadfield; D W Yates
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1986-06

4.  A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; R C Nair; I McDowell; J R Worthington
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rule in a university sports medicine center.

Authors:  John J Leddy; Anand Kesari; Robert J Smolinski
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.

Authors:  J J Leddy; R J Smolinski; J Lawrence; J L Snyder; R L Priore
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

8.  Inversion injuries of the ankle: clinical assessment and radiographic review.

Authors:  S C Brooks; B T Potter; J B Rainey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-02-21
  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes.

Authors:  Thomas W Kaminski; Jay Hertel; Ned Amendola; Carrie L Docherty; Michael G Dolan; J Ty Hopkins; Eric Nussbaum; Wendy Poppy; Doug Richie
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario.

Authors:  Sanjay Meena; Shreesh Kumar Gangary
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2015-06-20

3.  Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jong-Wook Ban; Emma Wallace; Richard Stevens; Rafael Perera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ottawa ankle rules and subjective surgeon perception to evaluate radiograph necessity following foot and ankle sprain.

Authors:  Res Pires; Aa Pereira; Gm Abreu-E-Silva; Pj Labronici; Lb Figueiredo; Al Godoy-Santos; M Kfuri
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.